LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Mason County wind turbine fails gloss test: Not in compliance with permit, commission says 

Credit:  By Brooke Kansier, Daily News Staff Writer | Ludington Daily News | November 30, 2016 | www.shorelinemedia.net ~~

SCOTTVILLE – For four years, the Ray family has shut their blinds, drawn a shade or moved to a different room as they live with a strong glare coming off Lake Winds Energy Park turbine No. 28 coming through their windows.

It’s wrong, argued attendees of Tuesday night’s meeting of the Mason County Planning Commission, where the results of paint gloss testing of turbine No. 28 were reviewed.

The commission agreed.

The gloss testing, conducted in October, found that multiple parts of the turbine were not in compliance with agreed upon limits for the turbine’s gloss level. That’s after four years of weathering which has dulled the turbine’s sheen.

“We have an ordinance, a set of standards they clearly didn’t meet. Even though we’ve seen a decrease in the gloss units, I think we need mitigation,” said Commissioner Janet Andersen. “(Residents are) still dealing with this. Something needs to be done.”

After some discussion at the project’s three-year-review in the spring, the commission chose to pursue testing of paint samples on the upper portions of the turbine. Those samples tested above approved limits – as high as 44 and 36.1 gloss units.

“So the board needs to decide what to do going forward,” Reilly said. “I guess that’s the big one. Do you want to require mitigation for any of the turbine, and if so, what parts?”

See the full story in Wednesday’s Ludington Daily News, print or eEdition.

Source:  By Brooke Kansier, Daily News Staff Writer | Ludington Daily News | November 30, 2016 | www.shorelinemedia.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky