[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Public not hearing caution, concerns of wind energy 

Credit:  Daily Advance | September 15, 2016 | www.dailyadvance.com ~~

According to the 2002 Siting Subcommittee of the National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC) Handbook: ”Wind farms emit no air pollutants, no greenhouse gases. Wind project operation does not consume surface or groundwater, or discharge wastewater containing heat or chemicals. Wind facilities produce electricity without requiring the extraction, processing, transportation, or combustion of fossil fuels. The fuel source for electricity generation from wind is free, thereby eliminating fuel cost uncertainty over the life of the facility. The overall price of electricity from wind will be more stable than from fossil-fueled power plants.”

The wind industry is hoodwinking environmentally-concerned citizens on many fronts. The spin from the wind industry looks like paradise, before the fall of man in the garden. No mention of the negative health effects to people living near the turbines. No mention of the wind companies buying the houses of those suffering environmental health issues living in too close proximity to wind turbines in Canada. No mention of strip bulldozing the farmland needed to stabilize the turbine before creating its base. (I believe the testimony was three acres for each.)

What is the air quality in the countries producing the wind turbines? How many gallons of fossil fuel will be used to manufacture the raw materials and deliver each finished turbine to Eastern N.C.? Some turbine producing countries don’t have good EPA track records, but the Board of Commissioners for Chowan and Perquimans counties are asked to blindly approve a C.U.P. application for turbines we don’t have all the specs on and don’t know from what country they will choose to manufacture them, if the application is approved.

The fuel source for wind energy may be free, but everything needed to produce electricity costs Americans money, time and will affect the health of those living closest to the turbine sites. Stable electricity costs is misleading because replacement costs to maintain and/or replace turbines and Grid power plant equipment can only go up. As the Apex presentation stands, before hearing testimony opposing the application, I vote “no” to the Timbermill wind farm application. It should be clear the application is incomplete.

Patrick Flynn


Source:  Daily Advance | September 15, 2016 | www.dailyadvance.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky