[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No right of appeal for farmer and his failed wind turbine scheme 

Credit:  By Jamie Ross | The Press and Journal | 10 September 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

A north-east potato farming firm has been told it has no grounds to lodge an appeal for a failed wind turbine scheme.

Farmers Inicio-Fresco Ltd have been knocked back again in a long-running application to install three 252ft turbines at Cairnandrew, near Banff, after the Scottish Government blocked the scheme.

The company has twice submitted paperwork with the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA), based on decisions made by Aberdeenshire Council.

Councillors refused the initial turbine application and, earlier this year, authority planners declined to review it, because it was deemed to be identical to the last.

Under Scottish Government legislation, planning authorities have the power to decline applications which have been reviewed by Scottish Ministers in the previous two years.

A DPEA reporter has now written to the firm, informing them its latest request will not be considered because there is “no right of appeal”.

A review of the turbines last year concluded that any positives the structures would bring would be outweighed by their negative impact on the local area.

A reporter said: “The proposed wind turbines would have a significant adverse impact upon the area’s visual amenity.

“Taken in isolation, this impact would not be so great as to deem the proposal unacceptable.

“However, having regard to the variety of existing and approved wind turbines in the area surrounding the appeal site, the cumulative visual impact and effect upon the landscape would be significantly adverse.”

Inicio-Fresco justified their appeal in documents sent to the DPEA by suggesting that there were new “material considerations” to take into account.

It included the number of proposed and active turbines within five kilometres of the site falling from 78 to 49.

The turbines would have provided “ongoing investment” into the potato business.

Source:  By Jamie Ross | The Press and Journal | 10 September 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky