Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
No right of appeal for farmer and his failed wind turbine scheme
Credit: By Jamie Ross | The Press and Journal | 10 September 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A north-east potato farming firm has been told it has no grounds to lodge an appeal for a failed wind turbine scheme.
Farmers Inicio-Fresco Ltd have been knocked back again in a long-running application to install three 252ft turbines at Cairnandrew, near Banff, after the Scottish Government blocked the scheme.
The company has twice submitted paperwork with the Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA), based on decisions made by Aberdeenshire Council.
Councillors refused the initial turbine application and, earlier this year, authority planners declined to review it, because it was deemed to be identical to the last.
Under Scottish Government legislation, planning authorities have the power to decline applications which have been reviewed by Scottish Ministers in the previous two years.
A DPEA reporter has now written to the firm, informing them its latest request will not be considered because there is “no right of appeal”.
A review of the turbines last year concluded that any positives the structures would bring would be outweighed by their negative impact on the local area.
A reporter said: “The proposed wind turbines would have a significant adverse impact upon the area’s visual amenity.
“Taken in isolation, this impact would not be so great as to deem the proposal unacceptable.
“However, having regard to the variety of existing and approved wind turbines in the area surrounding the appeal site, the cumulative visual impact and effect upon the landscape would be significantly adverse.”
Inicio-Fresco justified their appeal in documents sent to the DPEA by suggesting that there were new “material considerations” to take into account.
It included the number of proposed and active turbines within five kilometres of the site falling from 78 to 49.
The turbines would have provided “ongoing investment” into the potato business.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
![]() (via Stripe) |
![]() (via Paypal) |
Share:
Tag: Victories |