[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Lawmakers reach late-night compromise on energy bill  

Credit:  By Jon Chesto, Globe Staff | The Boston Globe | August 01, 2016 | www.bostonglobe.com ~~

In the frantic final hours of the legislative session Sunday night, House and Senate leaders agreed to a compromise energy bill that would spur big utilities to buy large amounts of electricity generated by wind farms and Canadian dams, but could also lead to moderate rate hikes.

The compromise bill, reached with just hours to go before lawmakers adjourned from formal sessions for the year, hewed more to the House proposal: a streamlined approach that would shift the state’s energy mix to include more hydro and wind power.

The Senate had proposed a much wider array of energy measures, but many of those didn’t make it into the final bill.

The compromise calls for the big utilities to buy up to 1,600 megawatts of off-shore wind energy. The language, however, would freeze out the controversial Cape Wind project from competing for those contracts.

The bill also calls for big utilities – namely Eversource and National Grid – to buy up to 1,200 megawatts of clean energy from the north, likely either hydropower from Canada or electricity from wind farms in northern New England and upstate New York.

Supporters say the bill could help the state meet its aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goals while diversifying the energy supplies as a number of older power plants shut down. The bill could also help create an entirely new industry in the state, as offshore wind developers use the contracts required by the bill to finance wind farms many miles to the south of the New England coastline.

“This is a huge victory for off-shore wind both for our environment and our economy,” George Bachrach, president of the Environmental League of Massachusetts, said in an e-mail. “It’s also a victory for diversifying our energy portfolio away from fossil fuels by adding both wind and hydro.”

But there’s a downside: the potential for extra costs, to be borne by ratepayers. It wasn’t clear Sunday night what those additional expenses would be, but critics expect consumers will pay some kind of a premium for the clean energy.

“This bill could be the largest of any utility rate hike in [the state’s] history,” said Dan Dolan, president of the New England Power Generators Association.

Dolan said he’s worried that some of his members’ power plants could be put out of business as a result of the preferred treatment that hydro and wind power are getting.

Despite losing the fight for a broader bill, the Senate scored at least one important victory with language aimed at encouraging the development of electricity storage systems in the state to help guarantee there is enough power during times of peak demand.

But several other Senate-backed provisions were scrapped. One discarded proposal would have doubled the rate of increase in the amount of renewable electricity utilities are required to buy, and another would have banned any electricity tariffs from being used to pay for natural gas pipelines.

The bill was later passed by the full and House and Senate and sent to the governor.

Source:  By Jon Chesto, Globe Staff | The Boston Globe | August 01, 2016 | www.bostonglobe.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch