LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Plans for the biggest windfarm in the Highlands are to go ahead 

Credit:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 30 July 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Campaigners have abandoned their fight against plans for the Highlands’ biggest windfarm yet – because of the prohibitive cost of further legal action.

SSE’s latest 67-turbine scheme will be built, with Scottish Government blessing, on a site the size of Inverness at the south end of Loch Ness.

Stronelairg’s contribution to saving the planet will span 8,650 acres and involve the excavation of a vast area of peatland – a massive carbon store.

The conservation charity the John Muir Trust (JMT) is yet to learn what its liability for the legal costs will be but confirmed yesterday it would not seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Court of Session had last week upheld an appeal by ministers and SSE against a previous ruling that had halted the Stronelairg development.

Objectors had previously successfully argued that the public had been denied the opportunity to comment on a revised planning application and that ministers failed to adequately address concerns of their own advisers at Scottish Natural Heritage who opposed in principle any windfarm on the site.

SNH had warned that the development would destroy the character of one of Scotland’s key areas of wild land.

The application was also opposed by the Cairngorms National Park Authority, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland and three out of four local councillors. Written objections from the public outnumbered letters of support by 15 to one.

In a statement, JMT said: “Fighting this has consumed a significant amount of time and money.

“We’re profoundly grateful for the generosity of all those who have donated to the Stronelairg appeal and to those who have pledged further support.

“After considering all the options, we’ve come to the conclusion that we have reached the end of the road with our legal action.”

Jim Treasurer of pressure group Friends of the Great Glen said: “Were he alive today, John Muir would be appalled that a government in 2016 is still sacrificing wild land and ecosystems for the sake of commercial interest.”

David Gibson of Mountaineering Scotland said: “The winner is big business. The loser is Scotland’s wild land. This development will cause massive environmental and visual damage to a much loved area.”

Legal fees prove a barrier

There will be no further challenge to proposals for the Highlands’ biggest windfarm yet because of the prohibitive cost of any further legal action.

The 67 giant turbines will be built by SSE near Fort Augustus on a site the size of Inverness.

The conservation charity the John Muir Trust confirmed yesterday (FRI) it will not seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court over Scottish Ministers’ approval of it.

The Court of Session last week upheld an appeal by ministers and SSE against a previous ruling that had halted the Stronelairg development.

Objectors had previously successfully argued that the public had been denied the opportunity to comment on a revised planning application and that ministers had failed to give adequate reasons for their decision when SNH was opposed in principle to any windfarm on the site because it could not be mitigated.

In a statement, the trust said: “Fighting this battle has consumed a significant amount of time and money.

“We’re profoundly grateful for the generosity of all those who have donated to the Stronelairg appeal to date and to those who have pledged further support. We could not have come this far without the backing of our members and supporters.

“After considering all the options, including initiating an appeal to the UK Supreme Court, we have come to the conclusion that we have reached the end of the road with our legal action.”

Source:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | 30 July 2016 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky