[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Cost of back-up for wind and solar to cost billions  

Credit:  By Mark Ludlow | Australian Financial Review | www.afr.com ~~

The cost of building contingency plans into the National Electricity Market to cover for the intermittent nature of wind and solar could cost billions of dollars and lead to higher power prices, according to energy experts.

As the debate continues about whether renewables are reliable enough to become the main power source in states such as South Australia, the Grattan Institute’s energy program director Tony Wood said it would be a costly exercise to provide back-up options for the less reliable wind and solar.

This would include more interconnectors between states to help cover for when the wind is not blowing or sun not shining as well as more gas-fired power stations to provide peak demand capacity.

A new interconnector between South Australia and Victoria would cost about $1 billion, while a new gas-fired peaking plant would cost hundreds of millions of dollars each.

It would also create the dilemma of further “gold-plating” of the power network, with the owners of regulated transmissions networks passing on the costs to consumers in the form of higher power bills.

“The big question is how do you manage this risk and who is going to pay for it? Eventually the consumer pays for it but who does it hit first?,” Mr Wood said.

Supply issues

Mr Wood said it would be too costly to have to provide a megawatt of reliable supply for every megawatt of intermittent generation, but there was still a need to augment the NEM to deal with supply issues.

But wind and solar producers could be forced to take on the intermittency risk and pay for back-up capacity, rather than state governments paying for extra capacity.

“In the short-term I think there will be some ugly solutions, like capacity payments or other expensive solutions, to get to the next stage [of embedding renewables],” he said.

The Australian Energy Market Operator – which runs the wholesale and retail energy and gas markets across the country – warned in February it would cost billions of dollars to duplicate the NEM to help cope with the problems raised in SA.

AGL Energy chief executive Andy Vesey on Wednesday said the regulations may need to be adapted to move the NEM away from an “energy-only” market, where generators are paid only for the power they produce and sell, to a “capacity” market, where they are paid to keep plants on standby, to be ready to generate power when needed.

Cheaper solutions

But others believe there could be cheaper solutions for bedding down renewables into the NEM.

Simon Currie, global head of energy for Norton Rose Fulbright, said there were several low-cost solutions to the problem of SA’s heavy reliance on intermittent wind power that could be completed within two years and there was no need to slow the development of renewable energy.

“We need to focus on how to build as efficiently and quickly as possible new flexible generation capacity,” Mr Currie said.

He said SA could construct peaking gas-fired power plants or concentrated solar plants within two years to fill the gap when the wind stopped blowing.

Concentrated solar plants are huge arrays of solar dishes linked to storage systems such as batteries that can be turned on when needed. He said such systems were operating in many countries, including the US and Morocco, producing electricity at prices competitive with fossil fuels.

Mr Currie said the SA government would not have to build the peaking gas plants. It could instead offer a guaranteed long-term contract for a plant to be on stand-by and the private operator and price could be selected by reverse auction in a process used in the ACT to buy renewable energy.

Source:  By Mark Ludlow | Australian Financial Review | www.afr.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.