LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Jefferson County Board Finance Committee passes tax abatement policy for energy projects 

Credit:  By BRIAN MOLONGOSKI | June 29, 2016 | www.watertowndailytimes.com ~~

The Jefferson County Board of Legislators Finance Committee Tuesday passed a new tax abatement policy for large-scale alternative energy projects. The policy requires that alternative energy projects with a 25-megawatt output must pay the county an amount equal to full taxation regardless of whether payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreement among taxing jurisdictions and the Jefferson County Industrial Development Agency is in place.

New York State Real Property Tax Law 487 allows for a 15-year exemption from taxation of increases in property value created by construction of solar, wind or farm waste energy systems. Taxing jurisdictions can require project owners to enter a PILOT agreement with each appropriate jurisdiction and their respective industrial development agency. However, jurisdictions are allowed to opt out of the law if they so choose.

The policy would affect projects such as Apex Clean Energy’s planned Galloo Island wind farm in the town of Hounsfield.

The wind farm will consist of 32 turbines and a 30-mile underwater transmission line from the island to a National Grid substation in the town of Oswego.

The project must go through the Article 10 review process, which is expected to continue for the next year with construction scheduled to start in late 2017. Construction will create 100 to 150 temporary jobs, but only three to five permanent jobs will remain once the project is finished in 2018.

Apex is expected to approach the Jefferson County Industrial Development Agency for a PILOT agreement, which would require approval from Jefferson County, Hounsfield and the Sackets Harbor Central School District.

Board members devised the resolution after it was decided that alternative energy projects don’t bring a sufficient amount of economic gain to warrant tax relief by the county.

Scott A. Gray, chairman of the Jefferson County Board of Legislators, said the policy works as a compromise – the county will approve a PILOT while also allowing taxing jurisdictions to make their own decisions regarding abatement.

“We are not trying to kill a project,” Mr. Gray said. “We are simply saying, ‘this is what we expect.’ We don’t subscribe to the theory that something is better than nothing.”

All but one legislator voted in favor of the policy.

Allen T. Drake, D-District Four, voted against the rule because he believes such projects still would bring enough economic activity.

“I think there is some significant secondary economic activity, which would warrant some kind of a PILOT,” Mr. Drake said. “Because of that, I just can’t see one blanket PILOT rule.”

JCIDA CEO Donald C. Alexander echoed Mr. Drake’s concerns, noting that the board should still consider each project individually.

“I would encourage all elected officials to look at them individually and understand the values of community,” Mr. Alexander said.

Cat Mosley, a spokeswoman for Apex Clean Energy, said the company has only expressed interest in pursuing a PILOT through the IDA and has not yet laid out specific tax abatement requests. She added that the company also has not had time to fully review the county’s policy, but the project will proceed as normal.

“We look forward to continued discussions with all involved jurisdictions,” she said.

Town of Clayton resident Gunther A. Schaller and town of Lyme resident Donald J. Metzger, who have often opposed wind projects throughout the county, attended the meeting to applaud legislators on the policy.

The full board will vote on the rule next week.

Source:  By BRIAN MOLONGOSKI | June 29, 2016 | www.watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky