[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windham rejects Iberdrola overture  

Credit:  By Susan Smallheer, Staff Writer | Rutland Herald | June 24, 2016 | ~~

WINDHAM – The Windham Select Board voted 2-1 this week to reject a request from wind developer Iberdrola Renewables to start negotiations about its 28-turbine project in the towns of Windham and Grafton.

Board Chairman Frank Seawright said Wednesday the board decided to reject the suggestion from Iberdrola, and the town instead asked Iberdrola to drop its plans and leave town.

“Given the marked unsuitability of the Stiles Brook forest for an industrial wind installation, we ask that you suspend your involvement with this project immediately,” two of the three Windham Select Board members wrote, along with the chairman of the Windham Planning Commission.

Seawright said that the town plan “expressly” outlaws wind development in the town, and he said it was the second such town plan to take a strong stand against wind.

The letter cites several environmental and human health issues, ranging from flooding and erosion worries to the effects on residents from long-term exposure to turbine noise, vibration, infrasound and shadow flicker from the turbines.

Twenty of the 28 turbines would be located in Windham, and Seawright said his home bordered the proposed wind facility.

Seawright said that while Iberdrola had made a financial offer of $715,000 annually that would essentially wipe out the town portion of Windham’s property tax, it wouldn’t affect the larger statewide school tax.

“But it’s never been based on the money. If we take the money, we won’t have a town,” he said.

Instead, Seawright said, the town will propose to the private landowner who is working with Iberdrola, Meadownsend Timberlands Ltd., “that they engage the town in discussion that could lead to the town’s acquisition of the property, so that it might be preserved for the good of us all.”

Iberdrola’s manager of renewables development, Jenny Briot, had written to the Windham Select Board last week, asking that the town appoint “an independent and balanced committee to discuss the form and terms of Iberdrola’s potential agreement.”

Briot also sent a similar letter to Grafton.

But one select board member voted against the strongly-worded letter to Iberdrola.

In a statement he released to the press, Selectman Kord Scott said that he refused to sign the letter, saying negotiations were “not an unusual business practice.”

“Having a developer, in this case Iberdrola, asking a community to discuss, or negotiate, the issues surrounding a complicated project such as this is not an unusual business practice.”

And Scott said if the town did agree to Iberdrola’s suggestion, “negotiating is in no way indicative of a tacit acceptance of a project – the voters ultimately decide.”

Scott also said he did not sign the letter because a group of Windham residents had submitted a letter to the Select Board in April, signed by 60 residents, that asked the Select Board to form just such a “bipartisan committee” to do what Iberdrola was asking.

Art Sasse, a spokesman for Iberdrola, did not return a call asking for comment.

Iberdrola said it would follow the wishes of a townwide vote, currently slated for November.

Source:  By Susan Smallheer, Staff Writer | Rutland Herald | June 24, 2016 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.