[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Amazon official criticizes Ohio’s wind standards in testimony  

Credit:  By Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Thursday May 19, 2016 | www.dispatch.com ~~

In a wind-energy debate with many recurring characters, there was a notable new face this week in Columbus.

The e-commerce giant Amazon sent an official to testify at a Statehouse hearing on a bill that would encourage development of wind farms in northwestern Ohio by reversing some recent rule changes. This is an unusual foray into Ohio politics for the company.

“Unfortunately Ohio’s wind-turbine setback standards enacted a little more than two years ago have significantly diminished the attractiveness to further investments in wind generation in Ohio,” said John Stephenson, Amazon’s manager for U.S. public policy, in the printed version of his testimony. “In fact, the current setbacks have acted as a moratorium of sorts on new wind development.”

He was one of more than dozen people who testified Wednesday about House Bill 190, a proposal that designates northwestern Ohio as an area in which the former rules on wind-turbine proximity to adjacent-property structures would apply.

This means new wind farms in that part of the state would be able to have more turbines than allowed under current rules.

The bill is a response to a 2014 measure, inserted into an unrelated bill, that had the effect of reducing the number of turbines allowed. It did not cover projects already approved by the Ohio Power Siting Board, but it did affect several plans that were still seeking approval or about to apply.

Amazon has been an investor in renewable energy in the states where it does business and is an increasingly visible business in Ohio, as it is developing data centers in central Ohio. In November, the company said it had signed on to develop a 100-megawatt wind farm in Paulding County.

A co-developer of that wind farm already obtained the necessary state approval, so the setback rules were not an immediate concern. But Amazon says it is also interested in the big picture of wind-energy development.

“Amazon believes the substitute version of H.B. 190 strikes a balance that will allow wind development in areas of Ohio where it makes the most economic and operational sense and will help bring into Ohio more high-tech operations that increasingly depend on renewable energy,” Stephenson said.

Northwestern Ohio, designated in the bill as a specific area that covers close to the entire northwest quadrant of the state, has the most brisk wind in Ohio, and has generated the most interest from wind-farm developers. The territory excludes Franklin County, but includes all or parts of nearly every county to the north and west.

Amazon is inserting itself into a long-running debate in which wind-energy companies and economic-development officials are trying to encourage wind farms, and a coalition of property owners is pushing back.

One of the prominent opponents is Julie Johnson of Urbana, and she submitted testimony against the new proposal.

“I am here to express the opposition and anger of my community and the hundreds of voters across Northwest Ohio who have worked so hard to protect our property and families with reasonable setbacks from industrial wind turbines,” she said.

The bill is now being reviewed by the House Public Utilities Committee.

Source:  By Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Thursday May 19, 2016 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook