| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Money for training is still a question mark in energy siting bill
Credit: By Mike Polhamus | May. 2, 2016 | vtdigger.org ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Senate is expected to vote Tuesday as it works to finalize a bill that supporters say will integrate the state’s energy planning and communities’ land use planning.
Before a floor vote on S.230, the Senate Finance Committee must decide whether to leave in a provision allotting $300,000 for the training of local officials in energy planning. Under the bill, the Public Service Board would be required to give “substantial deference” to approved energy siting plans drawn up by towns and regions.
The House Natural Resources and Energy Committee had stripped the $300,000 from the bill, but the Senate Energy Committee restored it after the House passed its version of the bill last week.
Senate Natural Resources Chairman Chris Bray, D-Addison, said he didn’t think keeping the funding provision would endanger the bill among House members.
“My understanding is that they get that a program without funding is no program at all,” Bray said.
Bray said he knows of nothing in the bill that House Natural Resources and Energy members consider a deal-breaker.
“I think it’s critical that we pass this bill,” he said. “There are a lot of people who’d like to see us complete the work.” Bray noted that as many as 70 audience members crowded into his committee’s meeting Monday morning to watch the bill’s progress.
By letting regional planning commissions write energy plans for their areas, the bill would give regions and towns the ability to direct the Public Service Board on where renewable energy projects should and should not go. This direction would bind the board except when the general good of the state clearly and convincingly requires otherwise.
S.230 also directs the Public Service Board to develop standards for how much noise can come from wind energy generators.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=77292 ]
