[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Study: Outer Banks vacationers say no to near-shore wind farms  

Credit:  By Jeff Hampton | The Virginian-Pilot | April 5, 2016 | pilotonline.com ~~

A study released Monday by North Carolina State University suggests most Outer Banks vacationers would protest with their feet and wallets if made to look at offshore wind turbines from the beach.

“Eighty percent of respondents would either not come back to the same vacation spot if turbines were built offshore, or said they would require such large price discounts to re-rent at the same location as to be unrealistic,” according to a statement from NCSU’s Center for Environmental and Economic Resource Policy.

“People want their beaches to remain in a natural state,” center Director Laura Taylor said.

The study included 484 respondents who viewed images of an array of offshore wind turbines as close as 5 miles and as far away as 18 miles. Respondents were less troubled when the 500-foot-tall turbines were more than 8 miles from shore, where the towers are not as visible, Taylor said.

Despite opposition to wind turbines in the beach view, nearly two-thirds of the respondents supported offshore wind energy, the study showed.

Plans for wind turbines off the coast of Kitty Hawk were reduced two years ago and moved far offshore.

The federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management identified three areas off the North Carolina coast for wind energy projects in 2012. The zone near Kitty Hawk was to be 877,837 acres and come as close as 6 miles. Several agencies, including the National Park Service, the World Shipping Council, the Virginia Maritime Association, the town of Kitty Hawk and the U.S. Coast Guard, either opposed the plans or called for changes. The federal environmental agency reduced the size of the area off Kitty Hawk in 2014 to 122,405 acres and said turbines would be at least 27 miles offshore.

Two others near Wilmington decreased slightly in size and remained between 12 and 17 miles offshore.

The study shows the economic harm for any coastal town if a wind farm is near the shore , or if the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management changes its plans to shrink the array off North Carolina, Taylor said.

The federal bureau has awarded 10 commercial offshore wind leases – eight through its competitive lease sale process, including two in Rhode Island, two near Massachusetts, two near Maryland, one near New Jersey and one off the Virginia coast.

Source:  By Jeff Hampton | The Virginian-Pilot | April 5, 2016 | pilotonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.