LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council to advise PAC of windfarm noise 

Credit:  By Victoria Leonard | Larne Times | 18 March 2016 | www.larnetimes.co.uk ~~

Mid and East Antrim Council’s Planning Committee has voted to advise the Planning Appeals Commission of an additional reason for refusal over the proposed Feystown Road windfarm, on the grounds of a noise impact assessment.

The six-turbine proposal was previously refused planning permission by the DOE in December 2014. The decision was then appealed, and further environmental information was submitted to the PAC on November 18 2015.

According to a council report, Environmental Health modelled predicted noise limits after planning permission was refused, and found the noise figures were “significantly higher” than those presented in the noise report.

“Environmental Health were not confident that the noise limits predicted by the appellant were robust enough to be able to offer conditions and therefore put forward the additional reason for refusal,” the report states.

Jurisdiction has now passed to the Planning Appeals Commission, but the report states that “parties are encouraged prior to submitting their statements of case to resolve areas of disagreement.”

“When further environmental information is submitted for consideration in advance of an appeal, the PAC expect the Planning Authority to consult with relevant statutory bodies and consider the new information,” it adds.

“This may result in reasons for refusal being withdrawn but also in additional reasons being proposed.”

The report says it would be “remiss” of council not to submit additional evidence. Cllr Stephen Nicholl proposed the recommendation to advise the PAC of the additional reason for refusal, due to “unacceptable adverse impact on the residential amenity,” and was seconded by Cllr Paul Reid.

Source:  By Victoria Leonard | Larne Times | 18 March 2016 | www.larnetimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky