[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Residents voice concerns at wind farm meeting  

Credit:  By Christina Lieffring | Columbus Telegram | February 18, 2016 | columbustelegram.com ~~

HUMPHREY – Loup Public Power District and Bluestem Energy Solutions, the Omaha developer behind Creston Ridge Wind Farm, held their first informational meeting Wednesday night in Humphrey to update the public on the project’s second phase.

This work includes adding three turbines near the four already in place at the wind farm located along Mason Road (205th Avenue) southwest of Creston.

Some area residents used the informational meeting to express their displeasure with the first phase of the wind farm project.

“If this project is so wonderful, why was it done under the table?” asked Charles Moser.

Moser sat next to Paul Gronenthal who voiced his opposition to the project to The Telegram in October. Both were convinced LPPD and Bluestem concealed the project from the public.

Loup President and CEO Neal Suess countered by saying the utility’s board meetings are open to the public and that The Telegram has covered the wind farm extensively. The Telegram reported when Bluestem pitched the project as early as February 2014 and reported final confirmation of the project and the site in January 2015.

But Suess and Adam Herink of Bluestem Energy conceded that more could have been done to directly reach those living near the site, which is why they decided to hold public informational meetings ahead of phase two.

Ivan Haschke was the most vocal opponent at the meeting. Haschke owns land just west of the wind farm and learned that phase two will put turbines even closer to his property.

Haschke’s concerns focused on how the turbines will affect his crops and agribusiness. He said pilots have told him that they may not be able to spray chemicals on his property. If he’s unable to spray and care for his crops, Haschke said, he may lose his seed corn contract. Haschke also suspects the turbines’ shadows will have a negative impact on his crops by blocking sunlight.

He’s also concerned that Creston Ridge will draw more wind turbines to the area, which could negatively affect his land value and ability to build there.

“What about if my kids or grandkids want to come back and build near a wind tower?” he asked.

In a phone interview, Bill Haman, an engineer at the Iowa Energy Center, said he’s seen research and regulations regarding shadow flicker’s impact on people, but not crops. In Iowa, he said, property owners near wind farms are often compensated to keep concerns regarding property values “at bay.”

Herink offered to provide a list of pilots who would spray near wind turbines and talk one-on-one with Haschke to work through his specific concerns.

Herink said developments such as wind farms create more opportunities in rural areas and will hopefully slow the declining population.

“We need to find ways to make rural Nebraska more productive other than grain production,” said Herink. “This is 21st century tech that’ll let rural Nebraska continue.”

The conversation lasted two hours, after which some attendees stuck around to talk with Suess and Herink individually.

“I don’t think we made everyone happy, but we obviously didn’t expect to,” said Suess. “But I and the Loup board members are charged with providing low-cost, reliable energy and that’s what we do.”

The next informational meeting will be held 7 p.m. Wednesday at Alice’s Cedar Inn in Creston.

Source:  By Christina Lieffring | Columbus Telegram | February 18, 2016 | columbustelegram.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.