[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State pays millions more in wind-energy incentives than projected 

Credit:  By Janelle Stecklein, CNHI Oklahoma Reporter | January 23, 2016 | www.enidnews.com ~~

OKLAHOMA CITY – In just two years, a controversial tax incentive designed to lure wind developers to Oklahoma has drained nearly $45 million from state coffers – well beyond what officials predicted.

Supporters and critics of the state’s zero-emissions tax credit agree its impact will only continue to grow as developers build wind farms to meet increasing demand for renewable energy.

Oklahoma Tax Commission paid wind companies $27.3 million in cash incentives for 2013, the most recent tax year for which data are available.

That was up nearly 50 percent from the $18.2 million claimed the year before. The commission isn’t expected to finish processing claims for 2014 until next month.

Those claims far overshot the commission’s own predictions two years ago that payments would swell to $19.1 million a year by 2018.

The commission admits it had no idea how fast the industry would grow.

“When an industry really grows, and demand really grows, it’s hard to factor that in,” said spokeswoman Paula Ross.

Rick Mosier, of Claremore, a member of the group Wind Waste, thinks critics of wind-energy incentives also misjudged how fast the industry would expand.

Two years ago, the group anticipated taxpayers would ultimately pay nearly $55 million a year. Now, he said, he expects $65 million in payments for 2014.

Wind Waste members focus on what they describe as “negative impacts” of wind energy development. For several years, they have focused on the zero-emission tax credit.

“It is, pun intended, growing like the wind,” Mosier said.

Lawmakers approved the credit in 2001 in a line tacked onto a bill releasing money for boating safety, he said. The credit was designed as an incentive to spur development of renewable energy.

Businesses that qualify receive credits based on the amount of energy produced by their facilities during the first 10 years of operation. Companies take advantage by lowering their tax payments to the state, then cashing in unused credits.

For example, if a company has a $100 tax credit but only owes $50 in taxes, it can sell back the remainder of its credit, or $50 worth, to the state for 85 cents on the dollar.

The reimbursement is paid from the state’s income tax fund.

Wind Waste wants lawmakers to wrangle the credit. Legislators could cap it, like New Mexico has done, or decide the wind industry is mature and doesn’t need the incentives it once did.

Mosier said wind is the only sector in Oklahoma that gets cash from state coffers. Everyone else is limited to using rebates to reduce income taxes.

“I think it went untouched because the proponents of wind convinced the Legislature that if we didn’t have some gratuity from the state taxpayers payable to them, that they’d go build their wind farms someplace else,” he said.

Mosier said he thinks legislators didn’t know what they were in for when they approved the credits.

Rep. Earl Sears, R-Bartlesville, who wasn’t in office when the 2001 deal was struck, said he knew full well the credits would grow to their current levels. He said he believes his colleagues in the Legislature knew it, as well.

“I sometimes don’t know if they fully grasp the magnitude,” he added.

Sears, chairman of the House Appropriations and Budget committee, is currently navigating the effects of a $900.8 million shortfall as he helps draft a new state budget.

Everything is on the table as lawmakers consider ways to cover that gap, he said, though he added he is reluctant to roll back tax credits – in any industry – for which businesses made plans when deciding to come to Oklahoma.

“I mean, how do you tell someone to come back to Oklahoma and we’ll do ‘X,’ and they get here and we say, ‘Guess what, we’re taking ‘X’ away from you?’” he said. “I just can’t be part of that.”

Still, Sears said the state could adjust future credits.

The Legislature did something like that last year, when it altered two other benefits for the wind industry. Lawmakers eliminated a five-year property tax exemption for new developments, starting in 2017, and they prohibited the industry from claiming investment or job-creation tax benefits.

Jeff Clark, executive director of The Wind Coalition, an industry group that encourages wind development in the region, said eliminating the zero-emission credit would go too far.

“Removing, or altering, this credit will have a devastating affect on those developers that not only offered up their ad valorem tax exemption last year, but more importantly, relied in good faith on our state’s laws encouraging them to choose Oklahoma over neighboring states,” he said in an email.

“In addition, it would further demonstrate that our neighboring states are ‘open for business’ while Oklahoma is not,” he said.

Clark said the incentives worked as intended and helped attract wind-energy investment as Oklahoma faced “fierce” competition from wind-producing neighbors Texas and Kansas.

“State tax incentives play a huge role in allowing Oklahoma to secure their development and continue to enjoy the long-term economic benefits brought by wind energy development,” he said.

New projects are added each year, and Oklahoma now ranks fourth in its capacity for wind energy, he said. Nearly 17 percent of the state’s electricity is now generated by wind.

In the meantime, he said, the industry pumps money into rural economies.

“Like the rest of the state’s business community, we are concerned about the state’s current fiscal situation,” he said. “But, we should remember that the state’s budget deficit is driven by slumping oil prices based on factors outside of the state, not business incentives that attract new economic activity, such as wind generation, to Oklahoma.”

Source:  By Janelle Stecklein, CNHI Oklahoma Reporter | January 23, 2016 | www.enidnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky