[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Churchover wind farm rejected once again  

Credit:  Rugby Advertiser | 20 January 2016 | www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk ~~

Another application for a wind farm in a village near Rugby has been rejected at appeal.

Energy firm RES (Renewable Energy Systems) failed to overturn Rugby Borough Council’s refusal of its initial planning application in 2013 to build Swift Wind Farm in Churchover.

The Swift Wind Farm development would have been built on land near Cestersover Farm and would have consisted of four turbines with total heights of 126.5m.

Residents of Churchover said they were ‘jubilant’ after Greg Clark, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, agreed with a planning inspector and turned down the appeal on Tuesday.

The protest group Against Subsidised Windfarms Around Rugby (ASWAR) has been campaigning against the intrusive wind farm since the first application.

An ASWAR spokesperson said: “We would like to thank the numerous people both locally, nationally and indeed internationally, who have all had a role in helping not just the battles along the way but now being on the verge of winning the final war against the subsidy speculators.”

Commenting on the decision, RES’ development manager for Swift Wind Farm, Daniel Patterson, said: “This extremely disappointing news; not just for RES but for the local community who were set to benefit from Swift Wind Farm.

“Our engagement throughout the planning process enabled us to identify issues of concern, explore solutions, and design a low-impact project which we have always believed would be a positive asset welcomed by the local community.

“It is therefore a sad indictment that the demonstrable support shown from within the region for both onshore wind and this project specifically was not enough to stop local people losing out on the very significant economic and environmental benefits this wind farm would have provided.”

Source:  Rugby Advertiser | 20 January 2016 | www.rugbyadvertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.