[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind raises a lot of questions  

Credit:  Union Leader | January 14, 2016 | www.unionleader.com ~~

Industrial Wind Developers want us to believe that global salvation, carbon reduction and the build-out of wind farms are all the same thing. By their marketing standards, we must do everything we can to stop climate change.

Has anyone thought that building wind farms on our mountaintops is actually counterproductive in our defenses against the impacts of climate change? Because our energy policy on wind farms will accelerate climate change with the destruction of each mountain ridge in New Hampshire, not to mention the destruction of wildlife habitats.

High-elevation forests are especially important to New Hampshire and many of you 4,000-foot club members understand that. Hikers pride themselves on their New Hampshire accomplishments. You either are one or know one, and most of you agree that wind farms are being developed at the cost of an intact ecosystem. Is that worth a mountain in New Hampshire?

How many wind turbines are destined for New Hampshire? How many mountain tops will be sacrificed? What cumulative impacts will they have? Should wind farms be placed in one regional community or spread out throughout the state? Why isn’t their wind data available to the public? Why are developers not responsible for decommissioning them? It’s sad that your questions fall on deaf ears, isn’t it?

As developers continue to degrade our defenses against climate change in their pursuit of profits, our responsibility should be to smarten up and stop them. Industrial wind development will actually worsen the impacts of climate change in New Hampshire.

Reduction, not destruction, is the answer.


Source:  Union Leader | January 14, 2016 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.