[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm project draws crowd at Temple  

Credit:  Pam Harnden, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | January 11, 2016 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

TEMPLE – More than 50 residents attended a public meeting Monday night to share thoughts on the town’s wind energy system ordinance and see what interest there might be, if any, in changing it.

The meeting was called after selectmen received a letter from a Renewal Energy Systems Americas Inc. representative. The company has an interest in mountain properties owned by Robert Thorndike and Jack Currier west of the Intervale. The company and land owners wanted to see if there might be interest in repealing or modifying the ordinance passed in February 2012.

Selectman Austin Foss said he thought the ordinance should be reviewed by residents. He didn’t want to turn down a project that could generate income for the town without voter input.

At the meeting were Dan Boyd, RES senior director project development; Peter Endrus, a contractor with RES working as a land agent in the Northeast; Sean Flannery, RES senior permitting manager; and Brooke Barnes, senior project manager with Stantec, a Topsham-based company.

Boyd emphasized there is no project being considered for the proposed area. He said this is not the only project being looked at by RES.

Since Temple’s wind ordinance was approved, several wind projects have been built in neighboring communities. Given the financial impact and the jobs those projects created, Boyd asked if Temple might not want to reconsider the ordinance.

Several questions were answered by the RES representatives. The towers would probably be 400 to 500 feet tall and more than 200 feet around. It requires an average of 7 to 12 acres of infrastructure for each tower, with 1.5 to 3 acres needed for the tower.

Resident Steve Kaiser asked who would compensate for the property value and way of life that would be lost. “The town isn’t fit for the industrial revolution. I’ll bear the tax burden to sustain the way of life I enjoy,” he said.

Ronald Rackliffe was in favor of a wind project. He said there’s no way that he, as a taxpayer, can pay for the road rebuilding needed in town.

Kathy Childs, whose father, Hollis “Bill” Mosher, once owned some of the land involved, asked townspeople to show some respect for the landowners and what they have done for the town.

“We need to think of them. Do it fairly and let the town decide,” she said.

Ben Milster asked if the town decided not to change the ordinance would RES’ legal team strategize with the landowners. Boyd said he would give his word not to challenge the ordinance.

Former Selectman Kathy Lynch said a wind project would not provide benefits for very long. “It worries me a lot,” she said.

The impact on wildlife, the possibility of fires and loss of access were other concerns expressed.

Janine Winn shared a picture of a Federal Energy Map. She said towers would be seen in much of the town.

Selectman Jean Mitchell spoke of the process to repeal or change the wind energy system ordinance.

Milster suggested using that process.

The possibility of a warrant article at the annual town meeting was also suggested.

Jo Josephson sat through hundreds of such meetings as a former journalist. She said she was proud of the town and excited about having the meeting. She thanked selectmen and RES representatives.

“You guys were even-tempered, candid and I think honest. I learned things I didn’t know. I think we have been exceedingly good,” she said.

Source:  Pam Harnden, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | January 11, 2016 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.