LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bon Homme wind energy law on books 

Credit:  BY RANDY DOCKENDORF | Yankton Daily Press & Dakotan | December 9, 2015 | www.yankton.net ~~

TYNDALL – The latest addition to the Bon Homme County zoning ordinance is no longer blowing in the wind.

No referendum petitions were filed by Tuesday’s deadline, so the county’s new wind farm regulations went into effect Wednesday, according to County Auditor Tammy Brunken.

The measure, known as Article 17, was prompted by the construction of the Beethoven wind farm. The farm is located near Tripp and covers parts of Charles Mix, Hutchinson and Bon Homme counties.

Article 17 was further prompted by the proposed Prevailing Wind farms, which would be located at a nearby site in Charles Mix and Bon Homme counties.

Article 17 was initially approved by the Bon Homme County zoning board. The proposed law then went to the county commissioners, who held a public hearing in October. The hearing was attended by nearly 100 people who packed the Bon Homme County courtroom.

The commissioners heard about 100 minutes of testimony from 35 people, split between 25 in favor and 10 against the measure. The commissioners also received written testimony from another two dozen people, with 17 in favor of the measure and seven opposed to it.

The commissioners unanimously approved the first reading that evening. The board approved the second and final reading at its Nov. 3 regular meeting without any amendments.

Article 17 needed to run twice in the weekly newspapers used for the county’s legal publications. The ordinance was then subject to a 20-day period in which the measure could be referred to the ballot, which would temporarily block the law from going into effect.

The 20-day period ended this week, and Article 17 became law, Brunken said.

Bon Homme County didn’t have any wind energy regulations prior to adding Article 17.

The ordinance carries a number of conditions for wind farms. However, a key provision calls for setbacks of 1,000 feet near residences and 550 feet near property lines.

Prior to giving final approval, the commissioners noted a wind farm could be constructed even with passage of the ordinance, but the county would have some controls. They added the Bon Homme ordinance would follow the state’s recommendations and what other counties have used.

Without Article 17, the wind developers would only need a conditional-use permit, the commissioners added.

Opponents argued the ordinance wouldn’t go far enough. They supported a larger setback and even an outright ban on wind farms in Bon Homme County.

The commissioners discussed possibly changing the proposed 1,000 feet setback to 1,500 feet. However, they didn’t make any amendments before the final reading.

The Bon Homme County commissioners could alter the new wind energy ordinance at any time, according to Brian McGinnis with the District III Planning and Development office in Yankton.

When it comes to the two recent wind farms, McGinnis told the Press & Dakotan that Bon Homme County is in a different position than its neighbors. Charles Mix County doesn’t have zoning, while Hutchinson County hasn’t objected to the wind operations, he added.

The Beethoven operation will be grandfathered under the new Bon Homme County ordinance. Prevailing Winds and any other future wind farms will fall under the new law.

The Beethoven wind farm can generate up to 80 megawatts of energy. In contrast, the Prevailing Winds farm could generate 200 megawatts of energy, according to Prevailing Winds president Ronnie Hornstra of Avon.

If its production capacity exceeds 100 megawatts, the Prevailing Winds operation would require a siting permit from the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (PUC), according to PUC Chairman Chris Nelson. Once the state permit is approved, the operation would go to the Bon Homme County commissioners for their approval.

Prevailing Winds project manager Roland Jurgens has told the Bon Homme County Commission that the wind operation is prepared to apply for state and county approval, according to news reports.

More information on the PUC’s regulation of wind and other forms of energy can be found online at https://puc.sd.gov/.

Source:  BY RANDY DOCKENDORF | Yankton Daily Press & Dakotan | December 9, 2015 | www.yankton.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky