LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm plans are blown away 

Credit:  Midlothian Advertiser | 08 December 2015 | www.midlothianadvertiser.co.uk ~~

Plans for a wind farm, which would have obstructed the view of the Moorfoot Hills to thousands, have been dismissed on appeal.

Wind Prospect Developments Limited had hoped to erect nine 102-metres high turbines at Mount Lothian, near Howgate.

Professor Tony Trewavas, chairman of Penicuik Environment Protection Association, welcomed the decision of the Scottish Government’s Planning Appeal Division.

He said: “We are very pleased because we felt this was an inappropriate application for this particular place.

“The reporter dismissed it on the grounds that the turbines would have been out of scale and would have dominated and dwarfed the Moorfoot Hills.”

Speaking on behalf of Wind Prospect Developments, Development Manager Karen Thorburn said: “We are extremely disappointed that the Scottish Government has rejected the application for the Mount Lothian wind farm.

“Many local residents expressed their support and we thank everyone who has taken the time to share their views on the proposal. During our extensive consultation it became clear that many people in the local community recognised the substantial benefits this project could have delivered locally and nationally.”

Midlothian Green councillor Ian Baxter said he had been opposed to the wind farm plan due to the lack of data.

He said: “There was no wind speed data and the test anemometer had only been installed shortly before the application was submitted.

“It wasn’t clear whether preparatory information had been carried out. I generally felt the turbines had been chosen for the site rather than the site chosen for the turbines.”

Source:  Midlothian Advertiser | 08 December 2015 | www.midlothianadvertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky