LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Top economist slams energy security report for lack of thoroughness 

Credit:  Mark Latham, Deputy Business Editor | The Herald | 7 November 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

One of Scotland’s leading economists has slammed a report on energy security from the Scottish Parliament’s Economy and Energy Committee, claiming that the committee had been “hijacked” by the pro-wind farm lobby and that the report “ignores the serious supply issues which will be caused by the forthcoming closure of the Longannet power station”.

The report on “Ensuring Scotland’s Energy Security” was published last month and follows a six-month parliamentary inquiry.

Branding the report as “very poor”, Inverness-based economist Tony Mackay said the report concentrated almost exclusively on electricity supply rather than the published objective of energy security while taking no account of the fact that electricity only accounts for around 20 per cent of energy consumption in Scotland.

“Electricity supply is very important to the Scottish economy but oil and gas are much more important,” said Mackay in his monthly report on the Scottish economy published Friday.

“Oil and gas production has declined substantially in recent years, raising serious issues about future security of supply.”

Mackay claims that the committee’s choice of witnesses who provided oral evidence were “almost entirely” drawn from pro-wind farm bodies.

Mackay also says that forthcoming closure of Scotland’s two nuclear power stations at Hunterston and Torness are dealt with “very poorly” in the report.

Source:  Mark Latham, Deputy Business Editor | The Herald | 7 November 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky