[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dixfield selectmen vote to send ordinance draft to Belfast lawyer  

Credit:  MATTHEW DAIGLE, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | September 29, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

DIXFIELD – The Board of Selectmen voted 5-0 Monday to have Belfast lawyer Kristen Collins draft language on sound limits for the Wind Energy Facility Ordinance.

At its Aug. 25 meeting, the board voted to accept a citizens’ petition requesting the ordinance include the complete Maine Department of Environmental Protection sound level limits, which are 42 decibels for nighttime and 55 decibels for daytime.

Town Manager Carlo Puiia said he discovered there are 26 pages on the DEP’s standards for sound limits.

“There’s a lot of stuff in here that doesn’t even apply to the town of Dixfield,” Puiia said. “It’s my thought Kristen Collins, who has worked on this ordinance before, should be the one to draft the language for the ordinance draft that will be put before the people at the June ballot next year.”

Resident Dan McKay asked Puiia what sections of the DEP’s sound limit standards didn’t apply to Dixfield.

Puiia said one section referred to “unorganized territories of the state.”

“That wouldn’t really be relevant to Dixfield,” he said. “The idea is to make sure the ordinance fits the town of Dixfield.”

The ordinance was written after Patriot Renewables LLC of Quincy, Mass., approached Dixfield officials five years ago about constructing 13 wind turbines on Colonel Holman Mountain ridge. Tom Carroll, project coordinator, said earlier this year that the ordinance’s 35-decibel nighttime limit would likely prohibit a wind farm in Dixfield.

The June 2016 vote on the ordinance will be the fourth since the original passed in November 2012. Revisions presented in November 2014 and June 2015 were rejected.

If voters approve the latest draft, it will replace the original ordinance which still stands. 

Source:  MATTHEW DAIGLE, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | September 29, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.