[ exact phrase in "" ]

[ Google-powered ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Could more wind turbines be headed to the area?  

Credit:  Sep 8 - McClatchy-Tribune Content Agency, LLC - Norwalk Reflector, Ohio | www.energycentral.com ~~

The Greenwich area isn’t the only local community that might experience wind energy in the near future.

According to appexenergy.com, Apex Clean Energy is considering constructing Firelands Wind, a clean energy project expected to generate about 99 megawatts of renewable electricity.

Firelands Wind, located in rural Erie and Huron counties, could offer an opportunity to address Ohio’s growing electricity demand “with clean domestic energy, while diversifying the local economy and supporting the rural farm community,” according to the website.

The proposed Firelands Wind project is northeast of Bellevue and more than 10 miles from Sandusky. The project is expected to include about 35 to 45 modern wind turbines, which will be interspersed across active farmland south of Interstate 80.

A state board, meanwhile, recently approved the development of Greenwich Windpark, LLC. The project calls for 4,600 acres and comprises 25 turbines, each 490.5 feet tall with rotor diameters of up to 383 feet.

Greenwich Neighbors United (GNU), which opposes the project, has expressed concerns about noise, proximity to GNU’s members’ land and health effects.

The Ohio Power Siting Board initially approved Greenwich Windpark, LLC, but Omega Crop Co. owners, Greenwich area residents and GNU activists Gerald and Connie Oney filed for a petition for a rehearing.

Omega has argued, among other things, that Windlab USA, the developer, hasn’t obtained the necessary waivers as required by law from adjacent property owners to bypass the required property setback requirements.

But a spokesman for the board said the body’s members didn’t find merit in Omega’s arguments.

Omega’s attorney, Sam Randazzo, said the Ohio Supreme Court might be the avenue his client uses to clear up the property setback issue.

“We’re pretty disappointed but there’s still hope,” Gerald Oney said. “We’re not going to give up by any means.”

Source:  Sep 8 - McClatchy-Tribune Content Agency, LLC - Norwalk Reflector, Ohio | www.energycentral.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User contributions

Share:


« Later PostNews Watch HomeEarlier Post »

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Formerly at windwatch.org.

HOME
Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share