[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Dixfield Planning Board table discussion on wind ordinance until Sept. 3  

Credit:  MATTHEW DAIGLE, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | August 20, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

DIXFIELD – The Planning Board voted unanimously Thursday evening to table discussion on the Wind Energy Facility Ordinance draft until Sept. 3.

The ordinance was defeated by voters June 9.

“It’s my understanding that the selectmen wanted us to pay attention to the section on sound limits,” Chairman Rick Davis said.

The defeated ordinance stated that no wind energy facility unit or system should generate sound levels exceeding 35 decibels from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m., or 45 decibels from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.

Patriot Renewables LLC of Quincy, Mass., approached Dixfield officials three years ago about constructing wind turbines on the Colonel Holman Mountain ridge.

The town’s original ordinance passed in November 2012 and a revised ordinance was rejected in November 2014 by a vote of 553-567. In February, selectmen voted to put the Planning Board’s original draft on the June 9 ballot.

Tom Carroll, project coordinator for Patriot Renewables, said previously that if residents voted for an ordinance that limited nighttime decibels to 35, it “would not be feasible to build a wind farm in town.”

Town Manager Carlo Puiia said the Planning Board is welcome to discuss any section of the wind ordinance that it wants, not just the section on sound limits.

“I think the board felt that the sound limit issue was the crux of the problems that residents had with the latest draft,” Puiia said. “You guys are an advisory board, so if there is any section of the ordinance you wish to discuss, you can discuss it.”

Puiia said officials received a citizens’ petition asking that the defeated ordinance be amended with the Department of Environmental Protection sound standards and be brought to another vote.

The Maine DEP sound standards for wind energy facilities are 42 decibels during the nighttime, and 55 decibels during the daytime.

“Just something to keep in mind moving forward,” Puiia added.

Chairman Rick Davis said Carroll was supposed to attend the meeting, but was forced to miss it due to a family emergency.

Selectman Dana Whittemore said he was hoping Carroll would be at the meeting so he and the Planning Board could “toss some numbers back and forth.”

“I hoped that Mr. Carroll would be here so that he and the town could maybe find a number between 35 decibels and 42 decibels that would work for everyone involved,” Whittemore said.

Planning Board member Lauren Hebert said he saw the DEP sound standards as “a blank check.”

“It gives them the right to come in here and impose their will on us,” Hebert said.

Resident Aaron Jamison said that he thought wind turbines would be beneficial to the town, in a business sense.

“So the town majority can impose the wind turbines on me and my neighbors?” Hebert asked.

“That’s part of being a town, part of being a community,” Jamison said. “It’s not, ‘Oh, you guys can’t do this because it’s going to hurt me.’”

Jamison said he agrees that Patriot Renewables and the town should find something between 35 and 42 decibels for a nighttime sound limit.

“I don’t want them to have full reign over us, but I do want them,” Jamison said.

Davis suggested that the Planning Board research sections of the latest wind ordinance draft that they were interested in, and discuss it during a Sept. 3 workshop.

Whittemore suggested that the Planning Board invite Carroll to the next meeting so they can discuss an agreeable nighttime and daytime sound limit for wind turbines.

Source:  MATTHEW DAIGLE, Staff Writer | Sun Journal | August 20, 2015 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.