[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Lawsuit against Botetourt County is tilting at windmills, attorney argues  

Credit:  By Laurence Hammack | The Roanoke Times | August 14, 2015 | www.roanoke.com ~~

A lawsuit claiming that a recently passed ordinance fails to protect Botetourt County residents from risks posed by wind turbines is based on speculation and should be dismissed, the county asserts in court papers filed this week.

Because there is no actual wind farm – or even an application to build one at this point – there is no potential harm for the court to consider, Botetourt County attorney Michael Lockaby wrote in response to a lawsuit filed last month against the county’s board of supervisors.

“For this court to have jurisdiction, there must be an actual case or controversy based upon a present, actual antagonistic assertion and denial of legal rights,” the response stated.

Filed July 23 by eight county residents, the lawsuit seeks to invalidate an ordinance passed by the county in June that establishes rules for industrial-scale, power-generating wind turbines built atop ridgelines. Action by the board of supervisors was prompted by interest from Apex Clean Energy, a Charlottesville company that is considering a project that would include up to 25 large turbines on North Mountain.

The lawsuit asserts that the ordinance fails to protect the plaintiffs and other members of the public from dangers posed by wind turbines. Among their concerns: low-frequency noise from the turbines and shadow flicker that can cause health problems, ice being thrown from the spinning blades during the winter and the risk of the turbines collapsing or catching of fire.

Another complaint leveled in the 20-page lawsuit is that the county failed to take into account the impact on birds and bats, which have been killed after flying into the spinning blades at other wind farm projects.

The county’s ordinance sets the maximum height of wind turbines at 550 feet – taller than the highest building in downtown Roanoke – and limits the sounds made by them to no louder than 60 decibels when heard from the nearest property lines. Also included are setback requirements that dictate how far the turbines can stand from adjoining properties.

In all, the new ordinance identifies 37 considerations that can be taken into account before the county decides whether to grant a permit for a wind farm, Lockaby’s written response states.

At this point, he wrote, the lawsuit’s assertion that the ordinance lacks teeth is “nothing more than a difference of opinion between a taxpayer and his government.”

The county is also arguing that six of the eight plaintiffs lack standing to bring a lawsuit because they either don’t own land in Botetourt County or live too far away from the site under consideration by Apex, which is about five miles northeast of Eagle Rock.

Tammy Belinsky, a Floyd County attorney who filed the lawsuit, could not be reached Friday.

Although Apex has not sought a special exception permit for the wind farm, which the ordinance would require, it has applied for a building permit for up to three data-gathering towers that it says it needs to test the wind on North Mountain before beginning construction.

The company has said that if its plans go forward, the turbines could be spinning by 2017 or 2018.

Source:  By Laurence Hammack | The Roanoke Times | August 14, 2015 | www.roanoke.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.