| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Developers appeal decisions by Aberdeenshire Council to reject turbines developments
Credit: By Blair Dingwall | The Press and Journal | 2 August 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Two wind farm developers have lodged separate appeals to the Scottish Government after their plans to build in a scenic area of Aberdeenshire were refused.
Two 326ft structures were proposed by WPD Rothmaise on farmland at the Hill of Rothmaise, near Fisherford, in May but were refused by Aberdeenshire Council’s Garioch area committee.
Earlier, a turbine of the same size – proposed by Muirden Energy at the Hill of Tillymorgan, also near Fisherford – was rejected by councillors.
Members concluded the Hill of Rothmaise development would have a “significant and unacceptable” impact and would lead to a “landscape of turbines” in the area.
Another 20 are already approved within six-and-a-quarter miles of the proposed site- 10 of them within three miles – while a further four are in the pipeline.
At the Hill of Tillymorgan, three turbines have already been approved.
Both WPD Rothmaise and Muirden Energy have now lodged planning permission appeals to Holyrood’s directorate for planning and environmental appeals.
A spokeswoman for Scottish Government said both cases would be dealt with on their individual “merits”.
She added: “Scottish ministers have received two appeals against the decision of Aberdeenshire Council to refuse planning permission in relation to wind turbine applications.
“Both appeals are at an early stage and once a reporter has been appointed, each will be considered on its merits.”
Originally, the Tillymorgan project was to be one-sixth owned by the Friends of Insch Hospital.
West Garioch councillor, Patricia Oddie, said the area near Rothienorman had reached “saturation point” in regards to turbines.
She added: “Whilst I support wholeheartedly the Friends of Insch Hospital and am not opposed to the principles of renewable energy I was unable to support a further turbine on Tillymorgan.
“It would heavily impact on the amenity of local residents and visitors who regularly use the hill due to cumulative impact.
“The landscape has a history of slate production which whilst not aesthetically beautiful is very much a part of local history.
She added: “For people that have objected, of course this is going to be a blow.”
A WPD Rothemaise spokesman said: “WPD are convinced that the proposal meets all planning and design standards and would provide a meaningful green electricity supply which is at an appropriate scale for the local area.”
A spokesman for Muirden Energy was not available for comment.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=72983 ]
