[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind turbine heights still concern some residents  

Credit:  By STEVEN JAGORD, Editor | Clarence Bee | 2015-07-15 | www.clarencebee.com ~~

Wind Energy Conservation Systems – or turbines – have become a popular means for many local farmers to save on their energy costs. And in the first half of 2015, multiple Clarence property owners filed for variances to the town’s Satellite, Antennas and Towers local law, which only allows structures to be a maximum of 60 feet tall.

Originally adopted in 1997 amid numerous requests for satellite towers, the local law never addressed WECS with only the 60-foot tower height limitation identified in all zones.

According to Director of Community Development James Callahan, the Zoning Board of Appeals has been hearing requests for height variances with no formal basis in local law to guide decision making. And some of those requests have gotten contentious.

Three months ago, the Zoning Board of Appeals denied Thompson Brothers Greenhouse’s application for a 133.5-foot-tall turbine following an outcry from neighboring residents.

In April of this year, the Town Board referred to the Planning Board a request to review WECS and make a formal recommendation on how to deal with the variance applications.

After reviewing the issue, the Planning Board proposed amending the law to allow for a maximum 80-foot WECS, with an additional 15-foot allowance for blade height above the tower – or 95 feet – for properties of at least five acres.

During a public hearing regarding the proposed amendment as part of the July 8 Town Board meeting, two residents aired concerns that allowing wind turbines taller than the current 60-foot threshold would deter from the town’s character. It was also suggested that more input from the community about WECS before Master Plan 2025 is adopted later this year would be beneficial.

No action was taken on the proposal.

In another matter following a separate public hearing, the Town Board approved the Planning Board’s recommended amendment to the multifamily housing zoning law, providing for small-scale retail uses in the Restricted Business zone.

The amendment identifies the special circumstances and conditions under which the Planning Board may recommend small-scale retail uses. The maximum size of any small-scale unit is 2,500 square feet.

Not everyone on the Town Board felt the amendment, which included types of uses for the retail, was a good thing. Councilman Bernard Kolber said he felt that convincing an appeals board that a variance for uses that do not fit those recommended is very difficult to do and could impede property owners from finding tenants.

“I don’t like this, and it’s not because of it being small-scale retail in the Restricted Business zone,” Kolber said. “It’s the fact that it’s being tied together and put under a multifamily law, which I think is the tail wagging the dog on this. It ties two things together that perhaps just shouldn’t be.”

The next Town Board meeting will take place at 7:30 p.m. Wednesday, July 22, at Town Hall, 1 Town Place.

Source:  By STEVEN JAGORD, Editor | Clarence Bee | 2015-07-15 | www.clarencebee.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.