[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

People power stalls plans to build eight turbine windfarm at Mochrum Fell 

Credit:  By Stuart Gillespie | Daily Record | 26 June 2015 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk ~~

People power has won the day on a controversial windfarm project … for now.

Objectors protested outside the council offices in Dumfries yesterday to make clear their opposition to plans for eight turbines at Mochrum Fell in the Glenkens.

And rally organiser Trevor Procter reckoned the demonstration “probably helped” as councillors voted to turn down the proposals, even though planners recommended for them approval.

Mr Procter said: “I’m relieved, now we just need to wait for an appeal.”

The project is the work of Falck Renewables and Coriolis Energy who had been looking to build seven, 126m-tall turbines and one at 116m.

After the meeting development manager for Coriolis Energy, Lynne Sweeney, said; “We’re disappointed in light of the report from the planning officer.”

Yesterday’s meeting was the second time protestors had gathered at the council offices. They did the same in April when councillors deferred a decision on the plans – which attracted almost 600 letters of objection – for a site visit.

At yesterday’s meeting Councillor Jane Maitland was critical of the proposals, calling them “unsuitable”.

She said: “There is, I think, an issue about the size of the turbines.

“The height of the turbines, tip wise, will exceed Mochrum Fell itself by up to 150 feet.

“I think the effect will be overpowering.

“Mochrum Fell is a significant local landmark. It is part of a nationwide network of trig points.”

And she believed the proposals were “too ambitious in scale for this particular site”.

She moved for the plans to be rejected on the basis they would have a “significant detrimental impact on the surrounding area”.

Councillor Tom McAughtrie backed her motion and there was no dissent from the rest of the planning applications committee.

Source:  By Stuart Gillespie | Daily Record | 26 June 2015 | www.dailyrecord.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky