[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Duke’s wind farm plan in focus 

Credit:  Rog Wood, Farming correspondent | The Herald | 22 June 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

The residents of Wanlockhead and the surrounding district will be able to hear the Duke of Buccleuch’s proposals to develop a 140-turbine wind farm – potentially one of the largest in Scotland – in the scenic Lowther Hills, in Dumfries and Galloway on Wednesday (June 24th) evening at a meeting to be held in the Wanlockhead Community Centre at 7pm.

This will be one of many “engagements” with local communities in a bid to win them over, as well as “test the water”.

The Duke has a wide range of options on a range of high hills that start near the Ae forest and run close to Muirkirk. Fortunately he faces no objections from tenant hill farmers, as the land under consideration is now farmed in-hand by Buccleuch Estates. There are large extensive hill farms such as Locharben, Mitchelslacks, and Garroch near the Ae Forest, then Dalveen that straddles the A702 linking the M74 to the A76, Glenim and Auchengruith that straddle the B797 that also links the motorway to the A76 after wending its way through Leadhills and Wanlockhead, and to the west of the CrawicK Pass that straddles the B740 link to the A76 after passing through Crawfordjohn, the remote farms of Blackgannoch and Fingland in the vicinity of Muirkirk.

Those farms, and others on the Queensberry estate no longer have tenant farmers as they were not replaced after they retired, moved on, or surrendered their leases in favour of very tempting cash offers. They are now run as extensive sheep farms by a skeleton staff of shepherds.

Such arrangements generally ensure land qualifies for Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) support schemes.

Publicly the Duke’s representatives say that nothing has been decided on, and that they want to hear the views of local communities. From what I hear and read, I suspect that plans are well advanced and the proposals are so substantial that they will be considered and decided upon by Energy Minister Fergus Ewing rather than Dumfries and Galloway Council.

I used to be chairman of the Mid and Upper Nithsdale Planning Committee of Dumfries and Galloway Council when I was a councillor twenty years ago. Even in those days we could see an alarming increase in interest in our region from wind farm developers, and decided to develop an Indicative Planning Strategy for Wind farms in Dumfries and Galloway. In essence we identified areas where we would never countenance their development for a range of reasons, others where we indicated we were open to persuasion, and areas where we had no objection. The current Dumfries and Galloway Local Development Plan has a section on wind farms, with supplementary guidance, that is a well-considered refinement of the old policy we pioneered.

In essence, we identified a ridge of hills to the south west of the River Nith where turbines were welcome, because they overlooked slag heaps from deep mining, open cast mines, industrial estates and the settlements of Sanquhar, Kelloholm and Kirkconnel. The hills on the other side of the Nith, and particularly the Lowther Hills we designated of such substantial beauty and importance to local tourism (the Southern Upland Way wends its way through them) that we deemed them to be inappropriate for such development. There were also important habitat and species to be protected, not least the beautiful but persecuted Hen Harrier, and I have heard reports that there are several pairs nesting in the vicinity of Wanlockhead this year. The modern Local Development Plan appears to be in broad agreement with the principles we outlined 20 years ago.

Unusually, a proposed development for 30 turbines on the preferred hills on the south west of the Nith at Sandy Knowe, that was supported by Dumfries and Galloway Council and the overwhelming majority of local residents, was rejected by Fergus Ewing.

Paradoxically, the developers at Sandy Knowe have submitted slightly scaled down proposals that will now be considered by Dumfries and Galloway Council and presumably approved.

The point I make is that because the Duke’s proposal is so massive, it has been taken out of the hands of the local council and will now be decided in Edinburgh. That cannot be right for local democracy, so it is incumbent on local residents to speak out clearly and make their voices heard at every level.

Source:  Rog Wood, Farming correspondent | The Herald | 22 June 2015 | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky