LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Hag Law bid is blown out 

Credit:  Peeblesshire News | 08/05/2015 | www.peeblesshirenews.com ~~

A bid for an eight-turbine wind farm near Romanno Bridge has been thrown out by Scottish Borders Council’s planning committee.

Members met to consider the application by Stevenson Hill Wind Energy Limited.

The company wanted to site the 100-metre turbines along Green Knowe, Hag Law and Wether Law – just a couple of miles outside the hamlet,

A total of 125 letters of objection were tabled with Scottish Borders Council as well as opposition from organisations such as Historic Scotland, the Scottish Rights of Way Society and Midlothian Council, who have also raised concerns.

Objections were also raised by several community councils around the rural Peeblesshire area.

Members of the Planning Committee voted unanimously to follow the recommendations of planning officers and refuse permission.

Planning officer John Hiscox said: “Hag Law does not conform to the usual requirements for wind farms in terms of its landscape and visual impacts.

“The Cloich Hills are small and the turbines would dominate them in terms of scale; containment is poor due to the nature of the landscape meaning that the turbines would be highly visible from many vantage points; the linear nature of the scheme and the placement of turbines on the ridges of distinctive hills is at odds with the subtle and attractive nature of the locality; the proposed access, infrastructure and the turbines would relate poorly to the landscape, would compete with the settings of several monuments and would cause adverse visual impacts in relation to the Scottish National Trail.”

The application was rejected on grounds of harm to the historic landscape, visual impact on surrounding settlements, lack of noise limitations, and its proximity to the Scottish National Trail.

Source:  Peeblesshire News | 08/05/2015 | www.peeblesshirenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky