[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Suit over pricey wind energy revived in Massachusetts  

Credit:  Suit Over Pricey Wind Energy Revived in Mass. | By JACK BOUBOUSHIAN | Courthouse News Services | May 20, 2015 | www.courthousenews.com ~~

The 1st Circuit revived claims that unconstitutional orders from Massachusetts forced an energy company to buy overpriced wind-turbine electricity.

Barnstable, a town on Cape Cod home to the affluent village of Hyannis, brought one of the lawsuits at issue, along with various businesses and individuals that oppose plans for an offshore wind-power-generation facility in Nantucket Sound.

They contend that Massachusetts cut a deal that required NStar Electric to buy electricity from Cape Wind, though cheaper energy was available out of state.

Claiming that the increased energy costs will cost consumers $1 billion over the lifespan of the 15-year contract, Barnstable said the “power-purchase agreement” came to pass because the state Department of Energy Resources “threatened to erect various regulatory roadblocks to the merger unless NStar executed a contract to buy electricity from Cape Wind on substantially the same terms and conditions that another of the Commonwealth’s utilities, National Grid, had agreed to several years earlier.”

A federal judge tossed the suit for jurisdictional reasons, however, finding that the claims implicate sovereign immunity under the 11th Amendment.

This analysis failed to sway the 1st Circuit, which revived the case Monday since the 11th Amendment’s bar hinges on demands for damages or restitution.

The Boston-based federal appeals court emphasized that Cape Wind’s opponents have characterized the continued enforceability of the power-purchase agreement as “an ongoing violation of federal law because Order 12-30 binds the parties to abide by the PPA’s allegedly unconstitutional terms.”

Since Barnstable and the others want to prevent future contract performance and avoid hypothetical damages, the relief they seek is prospective, according to the ruling.

Apart from a renegotiation of a contract that they claim will force them to pay higher electricity rates, the plaintiffs do not seek monetary relief, the court found.

Crucial to the trial court’s finding was the mistaken concern that the suit would frustrate state efforts to implement policies enunciated in the Green Communities Act and Global Warming Solutions Act, according to the ruling.

Writing for a three-person panel, Judge Williams Kayatta said precedent indicates that “a plaintiff may frustrate the efforts of a state policy when those efforts violate or imminently threaten to violate the plaintiff’s constitutional rights.” (Emphasis in original.)

The Nantucket Sound wind farm has been tremendously controversial in New England, splitting environmentalists who might be expected to support a clean, renewable energy source.

In addition to the concern for sea bird population, yachters and boaters have taken the position that the enormous windmills will ruin the beauty of the sound.

Cape Wind’s website says its facility will be the first offshore wind farm in the United States, producing more than 420 megawatts of power and reducing “global warming greenhouse gas emissions by 734,000 tons per year.”

Source:  Suit Over Pricey Wind Energy Revived in Mass. | By JACK BOUBOUSHIAN | Courthouse News Services | May 20, 2015 | www.courthousenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.