[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Test towers for wind earn endorsement in Canton  

Credit:  John Hult | Argus Leader | May 19, 2015 | www.argusleader.com ~~

Lincoln County’s zoning board gave the go-ahead on Monday to five meteorological towers designed to test wind power capacity.

Board members in Canton voted 4-3 on Monday in favor of temporary permits for Dakota Power Community Wind, a group proposing what would be the largest industrial wind farm in the state.

The towers will collect data for about three years, and the data would be used to sell investors on the 1,000 megawatt project around Beresford, Hudson and Canton.

The controversial project has spawned a vocal opposition group, We-Care South Dakota, and concerns over property values, noise, wildlife and quality of life were behind the denial of full conditional use permits for the same test towers in February.

Instead of appealing the zoning board’s decision, the company re-applied for temporary permits on the advice of the Lincoln County State’s Attorney’s Office.

The Monday vote will allow the met towers to operate for up to four years. One permit was approved in 2014, prior to the formation of We-Care.

“The permits are one of the first steps in the development process and our locally-driven project still has a lot of work to complete to bring this project to fruition,” said Nick Sershen of Val-Add Service Corporation, a backer of the wind project.

If completed, Sershen said, the project could mean millions of dollars in economic development for Lincoln County, boost school budgets and pay landowners thousands of dollars every year.

Opponents of the project say they are disappointed in the vote but also see a long battle. They fear an industrial wind farm would mean permanently altering the rural residential character of the area in the footprint and cut into property values.

“We see this as a hurdle, we don’t see it as the end,” said Winnie Peterson of We-Care. “We don’t look at it as a win or a loss. We look at it as a permit.”

Zoning board members Craig Nelson, Chad Anderson, Ron Anderson and Ron Albers voted for the towers. Dan King, who also is a county commissioner, joined Monty Derousseau and Darrel Sogn in voting against them.

King has heard concerns about safety, road wear and wildlife during months of debate over wind turbines, but the property value issue was the deciding factor for him. The zoning board has a mandate to protect property values, he said.

“I believe that folks within sight of the towers would have negative consequences if they attempt to sell,” King said.

The discussion surely will continue through appeals at the county commission level, King said. The opponents have five days to appeal.

Source:  John Hult | Argus Leader | May 19, 2015 | www.argusleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.