[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Windfarm plans turned down on appeal  

Credit:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 15 May 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Plans for a new windfarm in Caithness have been rejected on appeal by Scottish ministers.

It is the second time that a windfarm in the Spittal Hill area has been turned down.

The devices would have been 328ft high on land to the east of Spittal Hill.

The scheme also required more than 1.2miles of new access tracks and upgrades to more than 2.5miles of existing tracks.

Highland Council planners used their delegated powers to refuse the project in September last year.

More than 1,700 people wrote to the local authority concerning the application. Around 1,150 opposed the development, while 580 were in support.

But the developers, Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd, lodged an appeal to the Scottish Government.

Now reporter Timothy Bain has turned down the proposals because of the landscape and visual impact and the impact on residents.

He said that the windfarm would have a “substantial detrimental visual impact” particularly from viewpoints up to 2.5miles away.

While there were concerns about the impact on the Dunnet Head Special Landscape Area, Mr Bain said while the turbines would be visible, they would not have a significant effect.

But he did raise concerns that the turbines would “serve to diminish and detract” from Spittal Hill itself. He said the devices would appear “out of scale” with the hill.

He added: “Overall, while I accept that no individual residential properties would be overwhlemed or dominated by the turbines, I find that a substantial number would experience significant detrimental visual impact which would make them less pleasant places to live.”

Mr Bain also said that there would be a significant effect on Spittal itself.

Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd made no comment yesterday.

Source:  By Jane Candlish | The Press and Journal | 15 May 2015 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.