[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Town officers look to state agent for guidance on tax abatement request 

Credit:  Freedom reschedules wind farm meeting for April 27 | Devaluation would translate to $56,000 in taxes | By Ethan Andrews | The Republican Journal | Apr 20, 2015 | waldo.villagesoup.com ~~

Freedom – Town officials are looking to the Maine Revenue Service for advice on a tax abatement request from Beaver Ridge Wind. The owner of the three-turbine wind farm is asking the town to devalue the $10 million development by 30 percent.

When the turbines started producing energy in late 2008 they were the first in Central Maine Power Co.’s service area and among a small number in the state. The town initially valued them at $9.7 million based on BRW’s construction estimates but struggled over the next few years to find a figure that was agreeable to everyone. After a temporary bump, the value settled at $9.8 million and has remained there ever since.

According to BRW, that’s the problem.

The company contends that the turbines aren’t worth the same as when they were new. The town, they say, should have followed a standard depreciation formula used in other municipalities – 5 percent per year, based on a 20-year expected operating life.

BRW’s 2014 tax bill was $186,581.01, based on a valuation of $9.87 million.

The company is asking for depreciation based on the wind farm’s six years of operation. If approved, the abatement would save the company – or conversely, cost the town – $56,000 in taxes.

Depreciation could also affect how much Freedom pays into the local school district.

Property value is a key factor in Maine’s school funding formula; added value on the books often translates to less state aid.

Freedom’s share went up by roughly 20 percent in the years after Beaver Ridge Wind development went on the books, but not immediately. Due to a lag of two to three years in state assessments, the town got a honeymoon of sorts. During that time, the added tax revenue from the wind farm stayed in town.

If the abatement worked in the opposite way, Freedom would have several years of the same school district bills with slightly less money from tax proceeds to pay it. Though, as of this publication, it was unclear if that would actually be the case.

By law, any abatement the town gives to BRW would apply only to 2014 and later. It would not entitle the company to a refund on taxes paid in previous years.

Freedom town officials are scheduled to meet with Mike Rogers of Maine Revenue Service’s property tax division on April 27. The meeting was originally scheduled for April 13, but was moved after Rogers was unable to attend.

Selectman Steve Bennett said the town is looking to Rogers for an outside view of a fairly uncharted area of tax assessing.

“He probably has more knowledge about [wind turbine valuation] on the statewide level than anyone I know,” Bennett said.

Bennett said the selectmen, who serve in dual capacity as assessors, have held off on tackling the abatement until they could meet with Rogers.

“I think we have to be open,” he said. “We have to listen to what Beaver Ridge Wind has to say and what our assessors’ agent has to say and obviously what Mike Rogers has to say.”

He added that members of the public with an opinion should also be part of the conversation.

The meeting will be held on April 27 at 2 p.m. at Freedom Town Office.

Source:  Freedom reschedules wind farm meeting for April 27 | Devaluation would translate to $56,000 in taxes | By Ethan Andrews | The Republican Journal | Apr 20, 2015 | waldo.villagesoup.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky