[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Concern for bats won’t block Ohio wind farm 

Credit:  By David Wells | Courthouse News Seervice | March 20, 2015 | www.courthousenews.com ~~

Wind-turbine opponents failed to persuade a federal judge that concern for the endangered Indiana bat justifies their challenge of an Ohio wind farm.

Ohio-based Union Neighbors United brought the 2013 complaint in Washington, D.C., taking issue with the U.S. government’s approval of a permit for the Buckeye Wind Power Project.

The Indiana bat has been listed as an endangered species since 1967. Though the species does not hibernate in the general area of that proposed facility in west-central Champaign County, it does migrate through the area during the spring and fall.

In its application for an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species act, Buckeye Wind LLC estimated that its 100-turbine wind-generation facility, with use of various controls, would injure or kill 5.2 bats per year.

Finding that the proposal to lower turbine speeds during certain months met statutory standards, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service approved Buckeye Wind in 2013 for a five-year limit of 26 bat takings.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon granted the agency’s director and Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell summary judgment on Tuesday, finding no violation of the Administrative Procedures Act, the National Environmental Policy Act or the Endangered Species Act.

The 15-page opinion credits the finding by FWS “that the minimization and mitigation measures ‘fully offset’ the impact of the taking of Indiana bats, and thus, it was not necessary to determine if the plan was the ‘maximum that can be practically implemented.'”

“FWS used the best available scientific evidence and modeling, as well as its expertise, to conclude that the proposal will adequately protect the Indiana Bat,” Leon wrote.

Union Neighbors United – which is primarily concerned with opposing wind farms in residential areas, rather than protecting bats – had told the court that many of its members who live near the facility felt that the wind farm would reduce their ability to enjoy bat sightings.

Under development since 2006, the Buckeye Wind Project will generate 657,000 megawatt hours of electricity per year for the surrounding area, according to the ruling, which cites a joint appendix of the administrative record.

Source:  By David Wells | Courthouse News Seervice | March 20, 2015 | www.courthousenews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky