[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Editorial: Hot air over wind 

Credit:  Herald Staff | Boston Herald | March 7, 2015 | www.bostonherald.com ~~

The saga of Cape Wind has gone from simply wrong-headed – not to mention expensive beyond belief – to downright pathetic.

Rallies won’t save it – and neither will any legislative efforts to breathe life into this justifiably moribund project.

This week it was revealed that Cape Wind’s developers have backed our of a planned lease of a marine staging area in New Bedford. The project was supposed to pay the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center $4.5 million to rent the 28-acre facility to assemble the giant turbines that were going to blight Nantucket Sound.

The letter canceling the lease was actually sent Feb. 12, but that didn’t stop Cape Wind President Jim Gordon from presiding over a rally on Boston Common Feb. 28 at which he insisted, “We are not giving up. We have just begun to fight.”

Of course, the year began with Northeast Utilities (now Eversource) and National Grid terminating their agreements to buy the overpriced power that might one day be offered by Cape Wind. With Deval Patrick no longer in a position to hold a political gun to their heads and with Cape Wind unable to obtain financing, the utilities decided to put the interests of their consumers first.

So now Gordon is once again putting his hopes in the public sector, in particular a bill filed by Rep. Patricia Haddad (D-Somerset) that would require utilities to purchase stated amounts of offshore wind power and hydropower.

Gordon told State House News Service that it would take such a “revenue stream” to get the wind industry off the ground.

Political leaders “see the first price of offshore wind, and the first projects are going to be the most expensive,” he said. “Just like the solar projects were, but we have to educate policymakers into saying that look, once we get economies of scale going, once we start building a lot of these, the prices will come down …”

Yep, that’s what we were afraid of. One Solyndra scandal is enough – and hardly a role model for clean energy development.

Source:  Herald Staff | Boston Herald | March 7, 2015 | www.bostonherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon