[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Clean Line loses eminent domain hearing decision  

Credit:  By Robert Crozier, Staff Writer | Journal-Eureka | February 19, 2015 | ~~

If the developers of the Rock Island Clean Line project want to use eminent domain to acquire property for their planned transmission line, they will have to do it in a single hearing.

Their second request for a separate eminent domain hearing was rejected Feb. 13 by the Iowa Utilities Board.

The first motion to separate the hearing to determine if the project is in the public interest and can use eminent domain in general from the hearing to examine the details of the exercise of eminent domain on a parcel-by-parcel basis was rejected in November 2013.

The board determined that separating the hearings would benefit the developers at the expense of the landowners, and it may limit the ability of some landowners to fully participate in the process. It considered the preservation of constitutional rights, clarity and the possibility of confusion, administrative efficiency and the convenience of the parties.

“The constitutional due process concerns alone are sufficient to justify denial of the motion. … Splitting the hearing would improve the convenience of a few parties while detrimentally affecting the convenience of many others, particularly the effected landowners,” the ruling said. “The board will deny the motion to consider eminent domain issues in a separate proceeding.”

In its filing, the Preservation of Rural Iowa Alliance – an organization opposed to the project – argued that separating the hearings would give the developers too much leverage over landowners to acquire voluntary easements between the two hearings.

“This ruling was significant,” Preservation of Rural Iowa Alliance attorney Justin LeVan said. “If the hearing was bifurcated and the board issued the franchises and determined the route following the first hearing, RICL’s negotiating leverage over the landowners would have been prejudicially powerful.”

In a press release, the developers say the 500-mile direct current transmission line is needed.

“Despite the procedural decision, the fundamental need for the project remains,” the release said. “There is strong demand for cost-competitive wind energy delivered from northwest Iowa to Illinois. Affordable clean energy is good for Iowa and America.”

Source:  By Robert Crozier, Staff Writer | Journal-Eureka | February 19, 2015 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.