[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

“Smart” electric meters slammed at Kingston PSC hearing  

Credit:  February 5, 2015 | ww.midhudsonnews.com ~~

KINGSTON – Hundreds of residents crammed Kingston City Hall Wednesday night, to criticize the introduction of “smart” electric meters to New York’s energy grid. Their remarks were part of a hearing process conducted by the New York Public Service Commission.

Officials said the Kingston meeting turnout and duration exceeded recent hearings held in both Buffalo and New York City.

Opponents claim that the newfangled utility meters produce electromagnetic pollution, which may sicken residents, and the microwaves they emit when transmitting data are carcinogenic. Smart meters are required for home solar power arrays.

The industry contends that the smart meters are crucial to improving the grid, making it more flexible, responsive, and reliable.

“Reforming the Energy Vision” (REV) is PSC’s initiative to address a power sector in flux, to meet modern needs regarding new technologies, aging infrastructure, climate change, and resource allocation.

All these factors are leading to “significant changes in how energy is produced, managed and consumed,” the PSC contends. Particularly, the cost of solar power has dropped, calling into question the need for centralized power plants.

Eleanor Stein of the PSC said renewable energy sources are a front-burner topic.

“This is one of the themes which we’ve heard everywhere we’ve traveled, which is a tremendous interest by communities in taking control over their energy use, and how they do it, particularly with the view to increasing the amount of renewables within the system,” Stein said.

She predicted that the Hudson Valley will become “an absolute hotbed of distributed energy and local power.”

Almost four hours of comment followed an hour-long presentation delivered by PSC staff, with jargon rich in acronyms. Track One of REV considers the establishment of an independent Distributed System Platform (DSP) provider to regulate integration of various Distributed Energy Resources (DER) into the overall grid.

A DER can be a utility company, home rooftop solar panel, a tidal power generator, or community wind farm. Decentralized power breaks the electric utility monopoly, reducing regional players like Central Hudson to just
another DER to be interconnected via DSP.

Essentially, the PSC wishes to take control of the “grid,” from the franchises which currently control it, and make it into a separate entity called Distributed Energy Resources.

Track Two of REV involves drafting the new legislation and regulations to implement the initiative into policy and law.

“Those so-called smart meters are not smart and they’re very dangerous, so please don’t dismiss the voices of the anti-smart meter movement,” said Dutchess County Legislator Joel Tyner (D, Clinton), citing Dr. David Carpenter’s 2012 Bio-Initiative Report. He also advocated Community Choice Aggregation (CCA), and 100 percent renewable energy policy.

Ulster County Legislator Manna Jo Greene (D, Rosendale) noted the difference between CCA and CCA 2.0.

“CCA version one simply aggregates our energy purchasing power,” Greene explained. “CCA 2.0 includes comprehensive planning to bring more renewable energy infrastructure and efficiency into this region, on an accelerated schedule with increased local control,” including opt-outs, she said. She also recommended that REV exclude nuclear energy.

“It is a very dangerous and soon to be outmoded form,” Greene said.

Source:  February 5, 2015 | ww.midhudsonnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: