[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

£36m windfarm plan is rejected by Inverclyde councillors  

Credit:  Greenock Telegraph | 5 Dec 2014 | www.greenocktelegraph.co.uk ~~

Plans for a £36 million windfarm in the hills behind Greenock have been blown off course after councillors threw them out.

Hot air spread through the council chambers yesterday as councillors spent an hour debating 2020 Renewables’ plans to build eight 110-metre (360ft) tall turbines on land to the north and east of Corlic Hill, between Greenock and Port Glasgow.

After airing arguments both for and against the major proposals, councillors voted 14-3 to refuse the application in front of a packed public gallery in the town’s municipal buildings.

Concern over the development’s possible impact on air traffic radar was one of the key factors behind the decision.

But today, Alasdair MacLeod, development manager at 2020, said the company may launch an appeal against the decision with the Scottish Government.

Mr MacLeod said: “Obviously we are extremely disappointed – particularly given all the counter arguments we made on the aviation issue.

“This is a major opportunity for Inverclyde in terms of economic development in an area that does not get many opportunities.

“We are going to consider our next steps and will consider appealing to the Scottish Government.”

Ahead of the meeting, planning officials had recommended that the proposal should be refused on seven key areas, including the potential threat to aviation safety plus the ‘adverse’ impact it would have on the landscape.

The planning board also recently voted against the application before referring it to the full council for a final judgement.

Councillor Chris McEleny, who put forward a motion for the plan to be approved with the support of SNP colleague Math Campbell-Sturgess, said he respected the views of the objectors but strongly felt that the scheme should be approved because of the many benefits it would offer the area.

He said: “It has been a good debate which is clearly reflected in the difference of opinion in Inverclyde.

“You just need to look at the number of members of the public who have turned up for the debate.

“I think there are many great aspects to come out of this project – it would be good for jobs and I believe the renewable sector will be key to the sustainability of the shipbuilding industry.”

However, Labour’s Jim Clocherty moved for the plan to be refused, based on Glasgow Airport’s objection regarding air safety fears.

Cllr Clocherty said: “Council officers have made a number of recommendations on why the application should be refused but I think the key objection is from Glasgow Airport.

“We can’t do anything to put the residents of Inverclyde in danger.”

Councillors Vaughan Jones and Ciano Rebecchi also spoke out against the plans.

Mr Rebecchi said: “I do have a problem with windfarms being paid a lot of money to produce electricity for the people who need it most.

“I also feel that there are more suitable places to put windfarms.”

Source:  Greenock Telegraph | 5 Dec 2014 | www.greenocktelegraph.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.