[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Congressman’s response to Sierra Club and union’s call to extend wind PTC  

Credit:  By Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) | Congress Blog | The Hill | December 02, 2014 | thehill.com ~~

In a recent editorial, the head of the Sierra Club and the president of the United Steelworkers Union made two claims that I am compelled to address. First, that taking money from Kansans and giving it to Washington, D.C. to prop up the wind energy industry is actually a success story. Second, these liberal spokesmen asserted that Kansans and the American people support this. Neither could be further from the truth.

While the authors brag about the massive expansion of wind energy, they fail to account for the cost at which it comes—both to consumers and taxpayers. This growth is not driven by market demand, a claim they don’t even seek to make, but instead through a combination of state mandates and a federal tax credit that is more valuable than the electricity generated. This leads to perhaps the only point on which I agree with them: if an industry loots the U.S. treasury sufficiently, you can make even the most unprofitable business succeed.

And loot it has. As a key priority for the Obama administration’s anti-fossil fuel agenda, the federal subsidy for wind now stands at $5 billion per year.

But taxpayers don’t just pay once for this subsidy. The Wind PTC actually increases prices. According to the Energy Information Administration, in 9 of the 11 largest wind energy producing states, electricity prices have skyrocketed—rising four times the national average.

That means Kansan’s tax dollars are going towards subsidizing an energy industry that makes them pay more to heat their homes, while at the same time further reducing their after-tax income. This is tantamount to paying the government to raise your electricity costs.

Americans are starting to catch on to this scam. Warren Buffett, a supporter of President Obama, conceded in a May 4th Wall Street Journal article, that for “wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That’s the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without the tax credit.”

After spending record millions of dollars in an attempt to prop up pro-“green energy” Democrats this last election cycle, the Sierra Club and its union partners should pay attention to the results: the American people rejected their big spending agenda and supported candidates willing to end wasteful government handouts.

The Obama administration and its allies claim that wind jobs are dependent on this massive government handout. If true, that means that after 20 years of handouts, consumers still reject the wind industry’s product. I happen to believe in wind more than the industry does. I am convinced that hard working Americans – many in Kansas – and talented engineers can find a space for wind to actually provide a product customers are prepared to pay for without any government bribe. But propping up an entire industry while bilking the taxpayer and ratepayer is not the way.

Kansans, like all Americans, love freedom and are willing to work hard creating real and lasting jobs for their families: they just want government to get out of their way, stop picking winners and losers and let them innovate.

The Wind Production Tax Credit has expired. It’s been out of our lives for nearly a year. Why on earth would we bring back this zombie tax favor at the expense of the wage earning families that can afford it the least?

Pompeo has represented Kansas’s 4th Congressional District since 2011. He sits on the Energy and Commerce Committee.

Source:  By Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) | Congress Blog | The Hill | December 02, 2014 | thehill.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.