[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Cumbrian wind turbine plans rejected 

Credit:  By Sarah Moore | Times & Star | 27 November 2014 | ~~

Plans for a wind turbine have been thrown out after objections from around 200 people.

Allerdale Council received 177 letters of objection from the public over the plans for Dundraw Farm, near Wigton.

Workington MP Sir Tony Cunningham lodged an objection, stating that the turbine would have a negative cumulative impact. Seven parish councils, including Dundraw and Wigton town council, also objected.

D J Harrison wanted to put up the 500kW turbine, which would be 67m high to its blade tip, to provide electricity to the National Grid to power an estimated 372 homes.

Agent Susan Bell, of Neo Environmental, said he had tried to consider the community in making his plans. But neighbours told Allerdale Council’s development panel that the turbine would affect the landscape and views and could make flooding on the site worse.

Scott Norris, who lives within 700m of the site, said more than 200 people had objected and the land was on an aquifer – an area of saturated rock. He added: “I can’t think it would be a very good idea to excavate and pour concrete into an aquifer or to plonk a wind turbine in what’s normally a lake.”

Chris Ingham said turbines should be erected offshore in large numbers rather than on a small scale in areas where they would affect residents.

He added: “There’s little evidence of local support.”

The council received one letter of support for the plans.

The Solway Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty said the plan would affect views of the AONB.

The Environment Agency said the scheme should be carried out in accordance with a submitted flood risk assessment.

There were no objections from aviation authorities.

Planning officers recommended the plans be refused on the grounds of its cumulative impact on landscape and views.

Councillor Joan Wright moved refusal, seconded by councillor Carole Armstrong. The panel voted unanimously to refuse planning permission.

Source:  By Sarah Moore | Times & Star | 27 November 2014 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky