LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind-power developer eyes Alexandria area again 

Credit:  By DAN SEUFERT, Sunday News Correspondent | Union Leader | November 15, 2014 | www.unionleader.com ~~

ALEXANDRIA – A Portugal-based wind-power developer has found sufficient wind in the area to build a wind farm, and will be bringing a proposal for a large wind-power plant to five area towns and before a state committee in the coming months.

William Whitlock, executive vice president for EDP Renewables North America LLC’s Eastern Region, confirmed the company’s plans on Friday, saying EDP’s tests of the wind locally have been positive.

“There’s no question that there’s plenty of wind in the area,” Whitlock said.

The company also knows there’s a lot of opposition to its plan, though it hasn’t been formally announced.

“We know we have a lot of persuading to do of those folks, of course,” he said, explaining that the company plans to meet with people in area towns in the first quarter of 2015.

On Nov. 5, EDP filed plans with the Federal Aviation Administration for 29 wind turbines standing 499 feet in height. The turbines would be scattered among Alexandria, Canaan, Dorchester, Groton and Orange.

The plan for the turbines has changed from an initial set of details submitted by the company, with fewer turbines planned for Alexandria. The plan change happened after a recent hearing in town, at which residents voiced concerns about allowing a wind farm in town.

“We listened to what the people of Alexandria were saying and adjusted the plan accordingly,” he said.

The company has also been meeting with conservation groups, Whitlock said. In the weeks ahead, EDP will file a plan with the state’s Site Evaluation Committee, he said.

EDP doesn’t need local approval for its plans, just the SEC’s blessing. But the company wants area residents to also give their OK, he said.

“We recognize there’s a lot of people opposed to projects like this, but we hope there’s a compromise,” he said.

Whitlock said his company is aware that strong local opposition likely played a role in the decision by Iberdrola Renewables of Spain to drop its proposed Wild Meadows wind farm project in March. They are “hopeful” that EDP will have better success with area residents, he said.

“We know we have a lot of work to do to meet the concerns of local folks,” he said. “We know that a lot of people are displeased with wind energy in general. We are hopeful we can reach them.”

New Hampshire Wind Watch, a group of more than 3,000 residents in the Newfound Lake/Cardigan Mountain area that opposed Wild Meadows, is against the EDP plans, and warns of “the visual and audio assault these 500-foot turbines will inflict on the area.”

Residents in the area see wind turbines from Iberdrola’s Groton Wind plant, and many don’t like the view, Wind Watch officials said in a statement.

“We know better. Most residents of the area consider these turbines to be a visual and audio blight.”

Mark Watson of Groton said he and his fellow residents are not happy with Groton Wind.

“It’s my back yard neighbor. I know how it feels, I know what it sounds like and I know what it looks like,” Watson said.

“Buyer beware and do your homework because you and your children will be committed to living with these turbines for the remainder of your natural lives. I know my life in Groton will never be the same.”

Source:  By DAN SEUFERT, Sunday News Correspondent | Union Leader | November 15, 2014 | www.unionleader.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky