[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Councillors refuse Mormond Hill wind turbine application  

Credit:  Written by Jamie Ross | 05/11/2014 | www.energyvoice.com ~~

Councillors ended hopes of a 12-turbine wind farm being erected on top of Mormond Hill yesterday after backing the local authority’s planners recommendation to refuse the application.

It is the second blow to Muirden Energy in as many months after councillors on the Buchan area committee similarly rejected their plans in October.

Green Cat Renewable’s director, Gavin Catto, whose company represented Muirden, was present at yesterday’s meeting of the Banff and Buchan area committee. He told elected members in Banff that the project could produce more than 100 gigawatts of power annually if they gave it the go-ahead.

But there had been concerns from members of the public that the 326ft turbines would have had an adverse impact on the character of the area.

In total, 416 representations had been made to the local authority on the plans.

There were also safety concerns raised by the Ministry of Defence and air traffic control agency Nats.

Speaking yesterday, Fraserburgh councillor Brian Topping said: “Some people might say the top of a hill is an obvious place to put a turbine, but looking at the information we’re getting, I think I would be leaning towards supporting the officers’ recommendations (to refuse).”

Councillor Charles Buchan said: “I feel Mormond Hill is a very special place. It’s not part of a series of high ground – you can see it for 20 miles. The visual impact would be very high for a large number of people.”

Banff councillor Mark Findlater added: “The first and foremost thing we’ve got to take into consideration is public safety.”

Last night, the secretary for Strichen’s community council, Stan Tennant, said the village was split between those who supported it and those who were against it. He said: “I think it’s very mixed – about 50-50 – because the firm had promised that they would distribute money to good causes about the area. I think that got a lot of people to support it.

“The community council didn’t support it, but they didn’t object to it neither. They were quite neutral in the issue,” he added.

Mr Catto was unavailable to comment on the decision.

A spokeswoman for Aberdeenshire Council confirmed, however, that the company could now appeal the decision with the Directorate of Planning and Environmental Appeals in the hope of having it overturned.

Source:  Written by Jamie Ross | 05/11/2014 | www.energyvoice.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.