LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Minister demands answers after airport drops safety-related objections to wind turbines after striking £10,000 deal with developer 

Credit:  Exclusive by Stuart minting | The Northern Echo | 23 October 2014 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk ~~

A Government minister is demanding answers from a North-East airport that agreed to drop safety-related objections to renewable energy schemes after striking a £10,000 deal with the developer.

Aviation minister Robert Goodwill said it appeared “strange” that Durham Tees Valley Airport (DTVA) had lifted its concerns over plans for wind turbines at Melsonby and Gilling West, near Richmond, weeks after stating they could confuse air traffic controllers.

DTVA, which has seen passenger numbers drop from 900,000 in 2006 to 161,092 in 2013, sent two letters to Richmondshire District Council on August 20 objecting to the 26m-high turbines.

The letters, signed by its strategic planning director, Peter Nears, said the rotation of the wind turbine blades would create clutter in the form of twinkling or form false tracks on radar screens.

He stated: “This effect can be highly distracting for a controller and can cause confusion when trying to distinguish between real aircraft and false targets.

“As a result, the safe operation of the airport could be compromised.”

Mr Nears urged applicants Alternative Energy Consulting, which is based in Frosterley in Weardale to “discuss the possibility of dealing with this impact by applying mitigation”.

The district council’s planning committee heard the firm agreed to pay DTVA £5,000 per application and, ahead of the meeting, DTVA sent letters stating it was lifting its objections.

The authority’s leader, Councillor John Blackie, said: “The objections by the airport were a show-stopper for the schemes, but once they had been lifted we were able to approve the Gilling West plan.

“You are not going to change a radar system for £5,000.”

He said the authority had imposed conditions on the Gilling West plan that the turbine must not to be brought into use until the agreed radar mitigation measures had been implemented by the airport.

It is understood Alternative Energy Consulting was dismayed at being asked to pay £10,000.

A spokesman for Alternative Energy Consulting declined to comment.

When asked what radar mitigation measures a £5,000 payment would be used for and whether the money was related to the withdrawal of the objection, a DTVA spokesman declined to detail its plans.

He said: “Wind turbines that show up on the airport’s radar can impact on air traffic operations, resulting in significant costs being incurred in relation to short-term measures which may have to be put in place to mitigate the issues and longer-term technical solutions.

“Wind developers generally recognise the need to ensure that their turbines do not effect either airport operations or public safety and are willing to make a contribution to the cost of solutions if their schemes progress.”

Scarborough and Whitby MP Mr Goodwill, who will be briefed by the council, said: “I am somewhat intrigued by how the objections became less important with a relatively small amount of money.

“I would be more than happy to ask the airport what the initial threat was and to seek reassurances that these turbines won’t compromise passenger safety.”

Source:  Exclusive by Stuart minting | The Northern Echo | 23 October 2014 | www.thenorthernecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky