[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Belford wind farm plan refused  

Credit:  Berwick Advertiser | 08 October 2014 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk ~~

A proposed wind farm, which would have a ‘disastrous impact’ on a ‘lovely landscape’, has been thrown out by councillors.

The application for nine 100m-tall turbines on land to the west of Belford was rejected by Northumberland County Council’s planning and environment committee.

The Belford Burn proposal, submitted by Energiekontor UK Ltd, had sparked 500 objections.

Chris Craddock, chairman of the Middleton Burn Action Group said the scheme would do ‘serious harm to an iconic landscape’.

He said the scheme ‘would, in the bigger picture, generate only a trifling amount of electricity’.

Barbara Hooper said the National Trust was ‘extremely concerned about the impact of this proposal on our properties’, including Lindisfarne Castle, the Farne Islands and the viewpoint at Ros Castle.

Brenda Stanton, chairman of Belford Parish Council, urged the committee ‘to protect this unique and beautiful part of Northumberland and the local economy’, citing the importance of tourism.

Councillor John Woodman emphasised the ‘quality and importance of the landscape’ as the most important reason for refusal.

Michael Briggs, from Energiekontor, tried to highlight some of the benefits of the development, including the fact that the wind farm would produce 90 gigawatt hours of electricity per year, equivalent to 15 per cent of Northumberland’s annual domestic energy consumption.

“This wind farm would punch well above its weight in terms of the amount of renewable energy it would be able to produce,” he said.

He also mentioned the community benefit fund of £112,000 per year and the £500,000 contribution to the Belford station project, but he failed to convince the committee to go against the planning officer’s advice.

Coun Trevor Thorne moved refusal, saying that he thought the key issue was the ‘visual impact on this lovely landscape’, adding: “I think it would have a disastrous impact.”

Source:  Berwick Advertiser | 08 October 2014 | www.berwick-advertiser.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.