[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Christchurch council latest to lodge “serious” objections to Navitus Bay proposals 

Credit:  By Katie Clark | Daily Echo | 2 October 2014 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk ~~

Serious objections have been raised by Christchurch Council over the ‘monstrous’ Navitus Bay wind farm.

At an extraordinary meeting on Monday, councillors sent a strong message to the wind farm developers that they would not accept the damage the wind farm was likely to inflict on the Christchurch coast and countryside.

The scheme, which could see up to 194 turbines as high as 200 metres, has many critics, including opposition groups Poole and Christchurch Bays Association and Challenge Navitus, with Bournemouth and Purbeck councils also objecting.

As well as the visibility of the turbines from the coast and the effect on wildlife and tourism, councillors also objected to the large cable trench earmarked for Hurn Forest.

In unanimously objecting to the windfarm, councillors detailed their concerns in a local impact report to be sent to the developers in support of the authority’s stance.

Leader of Christchurch council, Cllr Ray Nottage said since 2011, ‘no one subject had exercised people more than this project’.

He said he ‘wasn’t convinced’ by the arguments for employment benefits, and hit out at the unpredictability of wind farms to create the amount of energy required.

Cllr David Jones, who described the wind farm as a “monstrosity”, said he was concerned by frequency of the word “mitigation” in the council’s impact report.

“It seems to me that the damage that could be done to the area cannot be mitigated; it will be too great”, he said.

Cllr Margaret Phipps, portfolio holder for the environment, said: “The environmental impact of this supposedly green wind farm is huge. I think it is actually environmentally wasteful. Surely producing renewable energy isn’t supposed to involve this sort of destruction to seascape, landscape and wildlife?

“I agree with other members that no mitigation can compensate for the damage to be caused.”

She added: “This proposal is in the wrong place.

“Turbines too close to shore and on a migratory bird route, the cable route corridor too long and too wide.

“The entire proposal has massive environmental and ecological consequences.”

Source:  By Katie Clark | Daily Echo | 2 October 2014 | www.bournemouthecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky