[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Better uses for $22 billion 

Credit:  The Weekly Times | ~~

Congratulations to Peter Tuohey of the VFF who “gets it”. (Weekly Times September 10th “Ill wind blows over RET).

Tuohey understands that $9 billion of taxpayer’s money has already been spent on the ill-conceived and flawed technology of wind power. He understands that wind power is unreliable and inefficient and needs to be backed up by base load power. He understands that not only do we pay as taxpayers, but that we also pay as consumers of electricity.

Tuohey and the VFF understand that if the RET scheme is left untouched a further $22 billion of OUR money will be handed to developers and turbine hosts.

I have no sympathy for hosts or potential hosts who feel their $100,000s of our money EACH year is threatened. They give no consideration to the impacts on residents in the surrounding district when they make their grab for money. They ignore the fact that people are suffering severe sleep deprivation, headaches, nausea and other debilitating symptoms. They don’t care that people have deserted their homes because they can no longer put up with the torture. It doesn’t concern them that our farms, our superannuation, are unsaleable.

Hosts fall for the propaganda perpetuated by Andrew Bray of the Australian Wind Alliance, and Leigh Ewbank of Friends of the Earth that turbines are clean and green.

Are they unaware of the thousands of tonnes of concrete that will be planted in their land? Do they not consider the footprint involved in the production of that concrete, or the footprint of the steel production, the rare earths used in the turbines that poison environments and people, and the millions of litres of fuel consumed in construction and transport?

As taxpayers we should all be standing up and saying that this $22 billion would serve us better being spent on health, education, police, ambulance, roads…
rather than lining the pockets of the few.

Chris Jelbart

Penshurst 3289

Source:  The Weekly Times |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky