[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

No more wind farms please: Scotland is full, says planning official 

Credit:  Mark Macaskill | The Sunday Times | 24 August 2014 | www.thesundaytimes.co.uk ~~

A Scottish government planning official has been praised by opponents of wind farms for rejecting a scheme on the grounds that ministers have almost hit their green energy targets.

Michael Cunliffe, a reporter at the Scottish government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, tossed out plans for the eight-turbine Barrel Law wind farm in the Scottish Borders, suggesting it was superfluous to requirements. He observed that against a target to generate about 16 gigawatts (GW) of energy from renewables by 2020, 6.8GW is operational, 6.5GW is under construction or consented and proposals for 7.2GW are in planning.

The move has delighted residents in the Borders who are fighting the expansion of onshore wind farms.

“We are pleased with the reporter’s decision as Scottish Borders are already overburdened with wind turbines,” said Jack Ponton, vice-chairman of the Borders Network of Conservation Groups.

“This is the first time that a reporter has so explicitly referred to the pending attainment of targets.”

In rejecting the Barrel law proposal, Cunliffe cited concerns it would interfere with military radar and detract from the natural beauty of the landscape around Hawick. However, he also made it clear that the vast number of wind farms in the pipeline had influenced his decision. He accepted that some wind farm proposals might be rejected or not be completed by 2020, but concluded that “the rate of progress and the availability of alternatives suggest that the weight that should be given to Barrel Law’s contribution is not as great as it would have been with a larger shortfall against the target, or a lack of other schemes”.

His remarks are unlikely to sit well with Scottish ministers whose economic case for independence rests heavily on exporting vast amounts of energy to other parts of Britain.

Source:  Mark Macaskill | The Sunday Times | 24 August 2014 | www.thesundaytimes.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon