LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind project deserves greater scrutiny 

Credit:  Baltimore Sun | August 24, 2014 | ~~

I was born and raised in Somerset County, and take issue with The Sun’s “Let the Navy decide” (Aug. 19) editorial concerning the Wind Energy project. It saddens me to think that the scenic landscape and natural resources enjoyed by so many will be forever changed as a result of greed and the political aspirations of a select few.

I find it unconscionable that 600-foot wind turbines could be placed in a pristine landscape surrounded by bird sanctuaries. In comparison, the tallest building in Maryland, Baltimore’s Transamerica Tower, is 528 feet. Further, the decision to “fast-track” this project demonstrates a blatant disregard for the impact these behemoths will have on radar systems that protect our country.

I commend U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski and Rep. Steny Hoyer for questioning the wisdom of moving forward before the second phase of an MIT study is completed. Unfortunately, it will be too late to react when the general public realizes what was shoved down their throats with promises of lucrative job opportunities, continuing economic benefits, protection of wildlife and zero impact on Patuxent River Naval Air Station radar systems. If you believe these promises then I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn.

Gov. Martin O’Malley’s veto of a bill that would have imposed a 15-month moratorium on the wind energy project confirmed what many of us have known since the project was first made public – final approval was assured at project conception, a classic example of “good old boy” backroom politics. The series of public hearings that were held were simply “feel good” meetings to pacify project opponents. Something was rotten in Denmark. The project was already a done deal.

I hope The Sun will assign an investigative reporter to this politically-driven fiasco to clear the smoke screen and ensure project transparency.

Bill Martin, Towson

Source:  Baltimore Sun | August 24, 2014 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky