[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine setbacks important for safety 

Credit:  July 21, 2014 | www.limaohio.com ~~

The July 12 front page story was outstanding at making potential area wind projects look like victims. But, before you sympathize with them, you must know that there is another side to this story.

House Bill 483 has increased the setback that a turbine must be from a property line to 1,125 feet. There is nothing to prohibit these companies from asking neighbors to sign a waiver and, therefore, still plant the turbine where it was originally planned. In fact, rumor abounds this is actually occurring at one of these proposed sites.

Worldwide, people complain and protest against low frequency vibrations produced by the machines, noise at night, fires and ice throws. Setbacks are essential to protect people and neighboring property and the wind industry has been given a free pass in Ohio, until now.

If our setback is now so unreasonable, how does it compare to other places? You may be surprised to know that our setback is actually SMALLER than and AT LEAST 39 other counties and states and significantly shorter than many countries. Why? Because as people become familiar with the machines, they have often asked for increased setbacks to prevent problems that they know neighboring areas have with them.

For specific examples, search the Web for “Master Resource wind ordinance debate.”

Thank you Gov. John Kasich, for protecting our people from these foreign companies!

— Dawn Davis, Spencerville

Source:  July 21, 2014 | www.limaohio.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky