[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Turbine case headed to New Jersey Supreme Court  

Credit:  Turbine case headed to N.J. Supreme Court | By ADAM C. UZIALKO, Staff Writer | Independent | dated 2014-07-17 | ind.gmnews.com ~~

Union Beach will ask the state Supreme Court to review a lower court decision that restrains the borough from enforcing an ordinance regulating the construction of wind turbines.

Two trial court judges have already ruled in favor of the Bayshore Regional Sewerage Authority (BRSA), ruling that a state statute restricting municipalities from regulating “small wind-energy systems” preempts the borough’s 2009 ordinance prohibiting turbines larger than 120 feet or louder than 55 decibels.

On July 3, a panel of judges in the Appellate Division of state Superior Court affirmed the earlier rulings that the statute trumped Union Beach’s ordinance, allowing the BRSA proposal to build a 380-foot wind turbine to be heard before the borough’s Planning Board.

However, the Borough Council approved filing an appeal of the appellate ruling to the state Supreme Court on July 10.

According to Stuart Lieberman, special counsel for Union Beach, the borough will issue a “petition for certification” asking the state Supreme Court to hear the case.

Lieberman said BRSA can still apply to be heard by the Planning Board, but he said the land use board “will not act unilaterally.”

“The land use board controls its own agenda,” he said, adding that it will decide if it is better to hear BRSA’s application or wait for the Supreme Court decision.

The borough will issue its petition on the grounds that the state statute is “unintelligible” and a belief that the law was special legislation, Lieberman said.

According to BRSA Executive Director Robert Fischer, the authority would have to seek a hearing before the Planning Board in order to move forward with the project.

“Union Beach says that a mapping error has rezoned the [BRSA] property from industrial to residential,” Fischer said. “We would have to go back to the Planning Board to have that changed.”

Wind turbines are not permitted in residential zones. In order to move forward with the project, BRSA’s property would have to be considered industrial, Fischer said.

He said no official decision had been made as to what the BRSA intends to do as of July 11.

“That’s something that would have to be discussed with the commissioners at the upcoming meeting,” Fischer said.

Lieberman said that while the borough’s turbine ordinance is pre-empted by state law, the proposal would still have to comply with other borough land use ordinances.

He said the ruling means that the land use board will not be governed by the local turbine ordinance when it evaluates this project.

The BRSA is also engaged in discussions with Conti Corp. over financial liabilities resulting from damages to the turbine components during superstorm Sandy, Fischer said.

Conti was contracted by BRSA to store, ship and assemble the turbine components at the Oak Street facility.

The nearly 200 tons of turbine parts, manufactured by General Electric, were shipped to a storage facility in the Port of Newark ahead of a planned trucking operation to Union Beach in the summer of 2012.

However, the shipment was blocked by a state Superior Court injunction after an appeals court ruled that the BRSA could not build the turbine without the approval of the Planning Board.

The components remained in the storage facility, which was ravaged by flooding during superstorm Sandy the following October.

Fischer said BRSA and Conti are currently discussing who is responsible for the estimated $1.6 million in damages to the turbine parts, and potential litigation is on the horizon.

Source:  Turbine case headed to N.J. Supreme Court | By ADAM C. UZIALKO, Staff Writer | Independent | dated 2014-07-17 | ind.gmnews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.